nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

[Fwd: [Fwd: NAT]]

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: NAT]]
From: Jose Luis Arbona Orovay <jarbo@INFOCENTRE.GVA.ES>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1998 11:50:21 +0200
Reply-to: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView et alia <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
Sender: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView et alia <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
--- Begin Message ---
To: "NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU" <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
Subject: [Fwd: NAT]
From: "Josi Luis Arbona Orovay" <jarbo@infocentre.gva.es>
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1998 08:49:47 +0200
--- Begin Message ---
To: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView et a <NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu>
Subject: NAT
From: "Josi Luis Arbona Orovay" <jarbo@infocentre.gva.es>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 11:07:43 +0200
We have a router with NAT active on an ethernet interface and in the map
appear a lot of interfaces, like if this interface had a lot of
secondary ip addresses, we have unmanaged all of this "interfaces", but
it's too difficult working. is there some tip to resolve this "problem"?

Greets.

    Josi Luis.


--- End Message ---

--- End Message ---
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Fwd: [Fwd: NAT]], Jose Luis Arbona Orovay <=

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web