nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Ethernet port on Remote Routers?

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Ethernet port on Remote Routers?
From: Drew Wall <drwall@TEKSYSTEMS.COM>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 16:55:27 -0500
Organization: TEKsystems
Reply-to: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
Sender: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
Has anyone run into this problem?
Solaris 2.5.1
NV 5.1
Only the serial ports on the customer's remote routers (Cisco) are being
discovered.  The ethernet port on each router is identified, but labeled
unmanaged, therefore NV is not discovering anything beyond the remote
routers.  I think it may have to do with the seed file, but it appears
correct.  The relevant addresses listed are 10.*.0.* and 10.*.*.0-50.
The routers ethernet ports are 10.*.*.1 so they should get discovered.
Is there a default max. 'hops' that NV uses to limit the discovery?

Background info:
- Communities are used but they are correct.  Verified through 'spot'
checks.
--
========================================================
Drew Wall
Enterprise Management
TEKsystems
mailto:drwall@teksystems.com
http://www.teksystems.com
========================================================

Attachment: drwall.vcf
Description: Card for Drew Wall

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web