nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

AW: Netview 4 to 5.1 Upgrade chktrapd.c

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: AW: Netview 4 to 5.1 Upgrade chktrapd.c
From: Schiffinger Ralph 2100 <Ralph.Schiffinger@ERSTEBANK.AT>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:30:00 +0100
Reply-to: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
Sender: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
Hello there,
you can safely ignore those errors if it really is just the length of the 
description fields.
As far as i've seen, especially Cisco and Optivity tend to make 
documentations instead of descriptions...
Regards, Ralph.

 -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von:    Radcliffe Jr, Arthur W [SMTP:arthur.radcliffe@AETNA.COM]
Gesendet am:    Donnerstag, 11. März 1999 20:25
An:     NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu; Schiffinger Ralph 2100
Betreff:        Netview 4 to 5.1 Upgrade  chktrapd.con script


Hello all,

While doing a Netview Version 4 to 5.1 upgrade, I ran the chktrapd.con
script, and received a number of errors stating that the length of the
Description field of traps, was greater than 99 words.  I was wondering  why
the script would check for that,  why the length of the Description field is
an issue to Netview 5.1 and whether we need to do anything to those
description fields.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • AW: Netview 4 to 5.1 Upgrade chktrapd.c, Schiffinger Ralph 2100 <=

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web