To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Need help w/ collection |
From: | Sean Davidson <sean.davidson@MAIL.PUBLIX.COM> |
Date: | Mon, 22 Mar 1999 14:04:47 -0500 |
Reply-to: | Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> |
Sender: | Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> |
I'm got a collection defined that currently has 600+ objects in it. The collection is used by our help desk to monitor a particular device at 600 of our locations. Here are the details on the collection rules I'm currently using: Collection: Store_Hubs
Collection: BayStack_503
Collection: BayStack_15x
The end result is that I get all the devices I need in the collection, but w/ that many devices, it is very difficult to read. As a result, I've added location containers w/ in the Store_Hubs collection submap and am cutting and pasting between the collection and the location containers. This apparently isn't the best way to define this collection. I'm getting duplicate objects in the collection, I've already got one object moved to the appropraite submap just below the collection and then the same object appearing in the New Object Holding Area in the Store_Hubs collection. Is there a way to define a collection using a range of hostnames? All these devices have hostnames that go like: s0xxxhub where xxx is the location number. If I can define a range of hosts names in a collection, everything will take care of itself. ________________________________________
Sr. Network Systems Engineer
<<...>> |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: help with simple ruleset, James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Regarding forwarding events to TEC !!!, Doug Horn |
Previous by Thread: | NetView 5.1 doesn't receive SNMP traps?, Weiya Cai |
Next by Thread: | Need help w/ collection, Leslie Clark |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web