Hello Netview/Optivity-folks around the world,
I would like to add the following DNS-Bug-Info on AIX4.3.2 to Your discussion
around Netview and Optivity.
We have found out, that the DNS-Bind-Version 4.9.3-implementation on AIX 4.3.2
is not
working correctly when You want to use the "DNS-address-sorting-feature" on LANs
where we use historically several IP-subnets per physical-router-interface.
We use the Netview/Optivity-NMS also as Primary-DNS with several IP-addresses on
the LAN-interfaces to a Token-Ring- and Ethernet-Network.
The DNS is not able to sort out the nearest IP-address of multihomed machines
like servers and routers.
The effect is that applications like Netview/Optivity are sending Pings not to
the nearest
available interface of multihomed-machines like servers and routers.
Our AIX-DNS-machine is configured with the following IP-addresses:
tr0: flags=e0a0043<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,ALLCAST,MULTICAST,GROUPRT,64BIT>
inet 163.158.61.160 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 163.158.61.255
inet 163.158.56.160 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 163.158.57.255
inet 163.158.58.160 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 163.158.59.255
inet 163.158.68.160 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 163.158.69.255
inet 163.158.70.160 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 163.158.71.255
en0:
flags=e080863<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,GROUPRT,64BIT>
inet 163.158.62.160 netmask 0xfffffe00 broadcast 163.158.63.255
The mistake can be seen by starting named with debug-level 5:
Debug turned ON, Level 5
Version = named 4.9.3 Tue Sep 30 09:51:20 CDT 1997:/
build@jto.austin.ibm.com:
considering [163.158.61.160]
dqp->dq_addr 163.158.61.160 d_dfd 7
listening [163.158.61.160]
considering [163.158.61.160]
dup interface address 163.158.61.160 on tr0
considering [163.158.61.160]
One line with dup for every IP-address is appearing here.
Network and sort list contains only first IP-adress of each network-adapter
addr xa39d3c00 mask xfffffe00 my_addr xa39d3da0 163.158.61.160
addr xa39d3e00 mask xfffffe00 my_addr xa39d3ea0 163.158.62.160
We have tested this also on a SUN which is used as BACKUP-DNS and can say that
address-sorting is
working correctly. Starting named with same Debug-level on SUN shows up with all
IP-addresses of the
SUN in the DEBUG-Output.
Does anybody of You know of a PTF for this mistake ?
We have already informed IBM in Germany but nothing has happened since several
weeks
Any tip or hint is welcome
```
(o o)
------------------oOO-(_)-OOo------------------
Winfried Gehrig mailto:Winfried.Gehrig@skf.com
SKF GmbH FON ++49(0)9721 56 3077
Schweinfurt Virtual FAX ++49(0)9721 5663266
(Germany)
Our bearings turn the planet
http://www.skf.com
-----------------------------------------------
|