nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: What happened to netmon Flag?

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: What happened to netmon Flag?
From: lclark@us.ibm.com
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 10:30:13 -0400

The -L flag was dropped in V6 (made a no-op) because it was no longer
needed. This is because, according to the internal update I attended,
32-bit masks are now fully supported; 32-bit masks are generally used for
software loopback interfaces. The connection is not exactly clear to me,
but I have seen loopbacks discovered successfully in V6, whether the
loopback was the address specified in the seedfile or not. So by my
voodoo-problem-determination methodology, I would suggest checking
the mask on the loopback that is missing. If it is not 255.255.255.255,
make
it so. If it is already so, look for some other, more mundane discovery
problem, or  call Support with a trace of the discovery handy.

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit


Kuffer Andreas <Andreas.Kuffer@kuoni.ch>@tkg.com on 07/06/2000 04:59:40 AM

Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>

Sent by:  owner-nv-l@tkg.com


To:   "'IBM NetView Discussion'" <nv-l@tkg.com>
cc:
Subject:  [NV-L] What happened to netmon Flag?




AIX  4.3.2, NV 5.1.2 and NV 6.0
in  version 6.0 of netview it seems that one flag of netmon (-L, discover
loopback  interfaces with other address than 127.0.0.0) was withdrawn.

I have  a Cisco 1600 with loopback interface 10.10.224.85 and three other
interfaces

Demand  poll with NV 5.1.2 (netmon runs with -L):
Interface 10.10.232.86 (currently up)     responded to ping

Interface 10.10.21.1 (currently up)    responded to ping
Interface 10.10.224.85 (currently up)    responded to ping
Interface 10.10.240.86 (down since 07/03/00)    ping timed  out

Demand  poll with NV 6.0 shows:
Interface 10.10.232.86 (currently up)     responded to ping

Interface 10.10.21.1 (currently up)    responded to ping

Interface 10.10.240.86 (down since 07/03/00)    ping timed  out

So it looks like  netmon V6.0 doesn't discover the loopback interface I'd
like to see. Does that  work as designed? Did I miss anything? Can I use an
undocumented "-L  feature"?

Any help  is very welcome...Andreas

With kind regards / mit freundlichen  Gruessen
Andreas Kuffer  (System Manager UNIX and Enterprise  Management)

Kuoni Travel Ltd.
Dep. TOU
Neue Hard 7
CH-8010 Zuerich
Switzerland
Telefon : + 41 1 277 52 41
Fax     : + 41 1 272 52 55

<<< the smile that you send out  returns to you >>>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web