nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Netview sizing

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: Netview sizing
From: Mearl Danner <jmdanner@samford.edu>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:32:24 -0600
Thanks Leslie.

We are interested in the web clients, but probably 3 or 4 (admins and User 
Support).

The 140 is going to be the ADSM (TSM) server (it's on a 7011 now). It's gone 
forever. Network management comes behind disaster recovery.

"It shouldn't be difficult to get a new box if this one doesn't work". But I've
been waiting 2 years to get the air conditioner in my office to get fixed. ;-)

On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 12:59:35 -0500 Leslie Clark/Southfield/IBM 
<lclark@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> I take it your present box performs well for you, and they want to regain
> the excess capacity, or you would not be asking. I think I would not be
> going too far out on a limb to say the less-capable box will work, if you
> are supporting only one user, occasionally two; and if I were you I would
> use the improvements in V6 to reduce your discovered databases to
> just what you are managing. That will help with the memory usage.
> Were you planning to run a large number of web clients? That might
> put you over the edge cpu-wise.
> 
> It may be a little tight at startup. Will they let you try it and change
> your
> mind if it does not run well?
> 
> Cordially,
> 
> Leslie A. Clark
> IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
> Detroit
> 
> 
> Mearl Danner <jmdanner@samford.edu>@tkg.com on 10/31/2000 11:56:19 AM
> 
> Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
> 
> Sent by:  owner-nv-l@tkg.com
> 
> 
> To:   IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  [NV-L] Netview sizing
> 
> 
> 
> 
> We are presently running Netview (4.x) on a 7043-140 (332PPC) 576M RAM. We
> have
> about 4000 objects in our database, but are only managing about 200. We
> have no
> other products installed except for an Apache web server for serving
> network
> stats.
> 
> The boss wants to use the 140 for another system, and has offered a
> 7043-240
> single processor (166) with the same RAM configuration for a replacement.
> 
> Will the 240 handle the newest versions of Netview (5.x, 6.x)? I'm
> concerned
> about the web capabilities of the newer versions increasing the load,
> specifically about having to run Java on a less capable platform.
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------
> Mearl Danner
> Data Communications/Network Specialist
> Email: jmdanner@samford.edu
> Samford University
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l

-----------------------------------------
Mearl Danner
Data Communications/Network Specialist
Email: jmdanner@samford.edu


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web