We are going to add on more memory on the NT and no we don't close the
session with the small "X" box at the top right of the NT window.
We tested the Web client but ran into performance poblems , slow updates
long time to logg in etc.
Mike Gruner
RFV Data
>I can't comment on Reflection but Exceed and NetView do work fairly well
>together. There are always going to be certain incompatabilities though and
>obviously recommendation to help them better work together. For example,
>Exceed on NT runs much better when the box has adequate memory installed
>(minimum 128MB). Also, DO NOT close the exceed session by using the small
>"X" box at the top right of the NT window as this does not correctly close
>down the X-windows client sessions on the NetView Server and you will end
>up with rogue processes on the NetView Server box which will end up
>consuming large amounts of CPU if not 100% of it.
>
>There have been other issues where Exceed and NetView have been used
>together. Have you considered using the Web Client in Version 6 of NetView
>as an alternative ?
>
>Gareth Holl
>Software Engineer
>gholl@tivoli.com
>
>Tivoli Systems / IBM Corporation
>Research Triangle Park, NC 27703. 1-800-TIVOLI-8
>
>
>"Gruner Mike" <mike.gruner@rfv.sfa.se> on 12/05/2000 05:14:00 AM
>
>Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
>
>To: nv-l@tkg.com
>cc: (bcc: Gareth Holl/Tivoli Systems)
>Subject: [NV-L] Question regarding Reflection vs. Exceed X-sessi ons
>
>
>
>
>We are using Relection for our NetView X-session and have discovered
>problem
>with sessions not responding eg. ping and demand-poll.
>When the NetView Gui is taken down and started up again sessions work ok
>again.
>Has anyone had the same experience with Reflection
>or is everything ok when you run for instamce Exceed ?
>
|