nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

AW: AW: cisco - router/switch configs and syslogs

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: AW: AW: cisco - router/switch configs and syslogs
From: FITZINGER Richard <richard.fitzinger@it-austria.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:55:58 +0200
sorry for the small emotional bit. but we are struggling with a large
heterogenous network and I have seen a couple of tools (Ciscoworks,
Optivity...) doing fine on UNIX and doing not sooooo fine on NT - what
mainly depends on the OS, not on the tool, I guess. I think where are no
major functionality differences between Ciscoworks' UNIX and NT versions.

what's superior? the stability of UNIX platforms - at least at our site ;-)

richard

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: netview@toddh.net [mailto:netview@toddh.net]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Juni 2001 16:17
An: IBM NetView Discussion
Betreff: Re: AW: [NV-L] cisco - router/switch configs and syslogs


FITZINGER Richard <richard.fitzinger@it-austria.com> writes:
> if your demand is...
> 1. to save configs automatically whenever running configs change,
> 2. to set up syslog reports that point out specific information from all
the
> syslogs,
> 3. to spend a little more money for managing your network...
> ... you should dump your NT installation and set up CW2000 on a solaris
box
> (with enough memory). that should  work (at least for 1. and 2.)


I'm curious about this bit.  What's superior about the Solaris
version?  Doesn't the NT version have the same functionality? 


-- 
Todd H.
http://www.toddh.net/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web