To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Link Reliability |
From: | z_esm_karekars <z_esm_karekars@bharatpetroleum.com> |
Date: | Wed, 1 Aug 2001 15:01:17 +0530 |
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. Hi, I may be wrong to put my query, I will put it again. The Reliability is 100 % if the counter value is 255, If it gets degraded it goes below 255. While if I had to set the threshold I have option only setting > (greater than), and not < (less than). I guess I need to set the Absolute value check to < 200, to trigger threshold action. and rearm value to Absolute <= 225 As I had set the threshold > 85 % as I mentioned it will trigger mail for all healthy links as they are greater than 85% at the time of data collection. Can U advice how can I achieve this. Regards, Santosh > ---------- > From: Scott Barr[SMTP:scott_barr@csgsystems.com] > Reply To: IBM NetView Discussion > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 8:33 PM > To: IBM NetView Discussion > Subject: RE: [NV-L] Link Reliability > > Wouldn't it be easier (or perhaps more logical) to fix the reliability > problem with the circuit? Sounds like the threshold works great! > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-nv-l@tkg.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@tkg.com]On Behalf Of James > Shanks > Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 8:41 AM > To: IBM NetView Discussion > Subject: RE: [NV-L] Link Reliability > > > Pardon me, but It sounds as if NetView is doing exactly what you told it > to > do. You are the one who decided how to do this, were you not? It was your > decision to set the thresholds where they are and your decision to send > e-mail every time the threshold was exceeded. It sounds like you are now > saying, "Well, perhaps I shouldn't have made the e-mail decisions because > this thing is broken too often." If you don't like the result, then it > is > up to you to design a better way to handle it. > > You could send the e-mail, not right from the trap, but from an Action > node > in ruleset which uses a Threshold to control how often the e-mail is > sent. > This is a common use for a ruleset. If you just use Event Stream(block) > --> Trap Settings --> Threshold --> Action (e-mail script) then you can > run this out of ESE.automation withoiut a problem. > > Or you could adjust the threshold levels, raising the arm level and > lowering the disarm level so that it doesn't fire so often, so that your > e-mails are only sent when it has really recovered and then gone critical > again. The data you collect via snmpCollect is unaffected and will still > be stored regardless of where you sent the monitoring threshold. So you > could stop sending e-mail altogether and just start saving the data for > analysis when someone is ready to look at it. > > James Shanks > Team Leader, Level 3 Support > Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT > > > z_esm_karekars <z_esm_karekars@bharatpetroleum.com>@tkg.com on 07/27/2001 > 01:57:56 AM > > Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com> > > Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com > > > To: "'IBM NetView Discussion'" <nv-l@tkg.com> > cc: > Subject: RE: [NV-L] Link Reliability > > > > > > Hi, > > I need to set this reliability threshold as there is a desperate > requirement to monitor the reliability of the link. Can U please reply for > this ASAP. > > Regards, > Santosh > > ---------- > From: z_esm_karekars > Reply To: IBM NetView Discussion > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 12:06 PM > To: 'nv-l@tkg.com' > Subject: [NV-L] Link Reliability > > Hi, > > I have NV6.0.1 on AIX 4.3.3 > > I had enabled data collection with threshold check exceeding 85 % with > Rearm of 50% for ifReliability, configured a trap to generate Mail in > case of threshold reached. > > It is observed that very large No. of mails are generated for this > collection. > > How can I restrict the same or use the ruleset to put threshold on the > # > of mails. > > Regards, > Santosh > > > > > _________________________________________________________________________ > NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l > > _________________________________________________________________________ > NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l > Hi, I may be wrong to put my query, I will put it again.
I guess I need to set the Absolute value check to < 200, to trigger threshold action. and rearm value to Absolute <= 225 As I had set the threshold > 85 % as I mentioned it will trigger mail for all healthy links as they are greater than 85% at the time of data collection. Can U advice how can I achieve this. Regards,
----------
Wouldn't it be easier (or perhaps more logical) to fix the reliability
-----Original Message-----
Pardon me, but It sounds as if NetView is doing exactly what you told it to
You could send the e-mail, not right from the trap, but from an Action node
Or you could adjust the threshold levels, raising the arm level and
James Shanks
z_esm_karekars <z_esm_karekars@bharatpetroleum.com>@tkg.com on 07/27/2001
Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com> Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com To: "'IBM NetView Discussion'" <nv-l@tkg.com>
Hi, I need to set this reliability threshold as there is a desperate
Regards,
----------
Hi, I have NV6.0.1 on AIX 4.3.3 I had enabled data collection with threshold check exceeding 85 % with
It is observed that very large No. of mails are generated for this
How can I restrict the same or use the ruleset to put threshold on the #
Regards,
_________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Netview 6.01 Exam ....need help, Edwin Kiran F |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Cisco MIB loading problems, Oliver Bruchhaeuser |
Previous by Thread: | Netview 6.01 Exam ....need help, Edwin Kiran F |
Next by Thread: | RE: Link Reliability, Leslie Clark |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web