nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Link Reliability

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: RE: Link Reliability
From: z_esm_karekars <z_esm_karekars@bharatpetroleum.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 15:01:17 +0530
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
Hi,

I may be wrong to put my query, I will put it again.
The Reliability is 100 % if the counter value is 255, If it gets degraded it
goes below 255. While if I had to set the threshold I have option only
setting > (greater than), and not < (less than). 
I guess I need to set the Absolute value check to < 200, to trigger
threshold action. and rearm value to Absolute <= 225
As I had set the threshold > 85 % as I mentioned it will trigger mail for
all healthy links as they are greater than 85% at the time of data
collection.

Can U advice how can I achieve this.

Regards,
Santosh
> ----------
> From:         Scott Barr[SMTP:scott_barr@csgsystems.com]
> Reply To:     IBM NetView Discussion
> Sent:         Friday, July 27, 2001 8:33 PM
> To:   IBM NetView Discussion
> Subject:      RE: [NV-L] Link Reliability
> 
> Wouldn't it be easier (or perhaps more logical) to fix the reliability
> problem with the circuit? Sounds like the threshold works great!
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nv-l@tkg.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@tkg.com]On Behalf Of James
> Shanks
> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 8:41 AM
> To: IBM NetView Discussion
> Subject: RE: [NV-L] Link Reliability
> 
> 
> Pardon me, but It sounds as if NetView is doing exactly what you told it
> to
> do. You are the one who decided how to do this, were you not?  It was your
> decision to set the thresholds where they are and your decision to send
> e-mail every time the threshold was exceeded.   It sounds like you are now
> saying, "Well, perhaps I shouldn't have made the e-mail decisions because
> this thing is broken too often."   If you don't like the result, then it
> is
> up to you to design a better way to handle it.
> 
> You could send the e-mail, not right from the trap, but from an Action
> node
> in  ruleset which uses a Threshold to control how often the e-mail is
> sent.
> This is a common use for a ruleset.  If you just use  Event Stream(block)
> --> Trap Settings  --> Threshold --> Action (e-mail script)   then you can
> run this out of ESE.automation withoiut a problem.
> 
> Or you could adjust the threshold levels, raising the arm level and
> lowering the disarm level so that it doesn't fire so often, so that your
> e-mails are only sent when it has really recovered and then gone critical
> again.  The data you collect via snmpCollect is unaffected and will still
> be stored regardless of where you sent the monitoring threshold.  So  you
> could stop sending e-mail altogether and just start saving the data for
> analysis when someone is ready to look at it.
> 
> James Shanks
> Team Leader, Level 3 Support
> Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT
> 
> 
> z_esm_karekars <z_esm_karekars@bharatpetroleum.com>@tkg.com on 07/27/2001
> 01:57:56 AM
> 
> Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
> 
> Sent by:  owner-nv-l@tkg.com
> 
> 
> To:   "'IBM NetView Discussion'" <nv-l@tkg.com>
> cc:
> Subject:  RE: [NV-L] Link Reliability
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I need to set this reliability threshold as there is a desperate
> requirement to monitor the reliability of the link. Can U please reply for
> this ASAP.
> 
> Regards,
> Santosh
> 
>    ----------
>    From:   z_esm_karekars
>    Reply To:       IBM NetView Discussion
>    Sent:   Tuesday, June 26, 2001 12:06 PM
>    To:     'nv-l@tkg.com'
>    Subject:        [NV-L] Link Reliability
> 
>    Hi,
> 
>    I have NV6.0.1 on AIX 4.3.3
> 
>    I had enabled data collection with threshold check exceeding 85 % with
>    Rearm of 50% for ifReliability, configured a trap to generate Mail in
>    case of threshold reached.
> 
>    It is observed that very large No. of mails are generated for this
>    collection.
> 
>    How can I restrict the same or use the ruleset to put threshold on the
> #
>    of mails.
> 
>    Regards,
>    Santosh
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> 

Hi,

I may be wrong to put my query, I will put it again.
The Reliability is 100 % if the counter value is 255, If it gets degraded it goes below 255. While if I had to set the threshold I have option only setting > (greater than), and not < (less than).

I guess I need to set the Absolute value check to < 200, to trigger threshold action. and rearm value to Absolute <= 225

As I had set the threshold > 85 % as I mentioned it will trigger mail for all healthy links as they are greater than 85% at the time of data collection.

Can U advice how can I achieve this.

Regards,
Santosh

    ----------
    From:   Scott Barr[SMTP:scott_barr@csgsystems.com]
    Reply To:       IBM NetView Discussion
    Sent:   Friday, July 27, 2001 8:33 PM
    To:     IBM NetView Discussion
    Subject:        RE: [NV-L] Link Reliability

    Wouldn't it be easier (or perhaps more logical) to fix the reliability
    problem with the circuit? Sounds like the threshold works great!

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-nv-l@tkg.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@tkg.com]On Behalf Of James
    Shanks
    Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 8:41 AM
    To: IBM NetView Discussion
    Subject: RE: [NV-L] Link Reliability


    Pardon me, but It sounds as if NetView is doing exactly what you told it to
    do. You are the one who decided how to do this, were you not?  It was your
    decision to set the thresholds where they are and your decision to send
    e-mail every time the threshold was exceeded.   It sounds like you are now
    saying, "Well, perhaps I shouldn't have made the e-mail decisions because
    this thing is broken too often."   If you don't like the result, then it is
    up to you to design a better way to handle it.

    You could send the e-mail, not right from the trap, but from an Action node
    in  ruleset which uses a Threshold to control how often the e-mail is sent.
    This is a common use for a ruleset.  If you just use  Event Stream(block)
    --> Trap Settings  --> Threshold --> Action (e-mail script)   then you can
    run this out of ESE.automation withoiut a problem.

    Or you could adjust the threshold levels, raising the arm level and
    lowering the disarm level so that it doesn't fire so often, so that your
    e-mails are only sent when it has really recovered and then gone critical
    again.  The data you collect via snmpCollect is unaffected and will still
    be stored regardless of where you sent the monitoring threshold.  So  you
    could stop sending e-mail altogether and just start saving the data for
    analysis when someone is ready to look at it.

    James Shanks
    Team Leader, Level 3 Support
    Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT


    z_esm_karekars <z_esm_karekars@bharatpetroleum.com>@tkg.com on 07/27/2001
    01:57:56 AM

    Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>

    Sent by:  owner-nv-l@tkg.com


    To:   "'IBM NetView Discussion'" <nv-l@tkg.com>
    cc:
    Subject:  RE: [NV-L] Link Reliability





    Hi,

    I need to set this reliability threshold as there is a desperate
    requirement to monitor the reliability of the link. Can U please reply for
    this ASAP.

    Regards,
    Santosh

       ----------
       From:   z_esm_karekars
       Reply To:       IBM NetView Discussion
       Sent:   Tuesday, June 26, 2001 12:06 PM
       To:     'nv-l@tkg.com'
       Subject:        [NV-L] Link Reliability

       Hi,

       I have NV6.0.1 on AIX 4.3.3

       I had enabled data collection with threshold check exceeding 85 % with
       Rearm of 50% for ifReliability, configured a trap to generate Mail in
       case of threshold reached.

       It is observed that very large No. of mails are generated for this
       collection.

       How can I restrict the same or use the ruleset to put threshold on the #
       of mails.

       Regards,
       Santosh




    _________________________________________________________________________
    NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l

    _________________________________________________________________________
    NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web