I had the integration working on Version 5.1.2 of
Netview for NT. I don't think they have changed it
since. From my experience, the non-TME version is
always much more stable and a lot faster. I have done
a packet capture of the traffic, all it does is do a
postemsg to the TEC.
On your tecad_nv6k.conf, make sure you have a valid
directory for the cache file. If I remember
correctly, the adapter may not start if the /tmp or
whatever temporary directory you specify doesn't exist
For example:
BufEvtPath=/tmp/nv6k.cache
Also, if your TEC is on NT, your have to specify the
ServerPort=5529
I used to receive the Dr. Watson error, and the CPU
utilization usually spike to 100%. Did you make
modification to the tecad_nv6k.cds file? If you did,
try use the default one and see if it starts. I had
to rewrote my own tecad_nv6k.cds, and it won't start
unless the configuration files are exactly right.
Also, is your Netview and TEC on the same box. I have
never run the newer version of TEC/TMR and Netview on
the same NT server before. I am not sure it's a good
idea unless you have a pretty powerful server.
--- Zhenyu GE <gezhengy@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi! All
>
> Today in my testing on the integration between
> netview for NT and tec I met
> problems.
> The secure version of the Adapter cannot start. The
> non-secure version can
> start,
> but generated Dr.Watson when send any nv event.
>
> If you have made the integration successfully please
> give me a clue.
>
> My environment: NT4sp6 (Chinese Version), TMF37b,
> NV602, TEC37
>
> Best Regards!
> Ge Zhenyu(Oliver)
>
>
_________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives:
http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
=====
Xu He
Senior Network Engineer
Verisign, Inc.
http://www.verisign.com
(o)704-378-1398
(c)704-231-7186
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
|