Thank you Mike for you time.
If I have both will you use NETVIEW or CW for the monitoring
parts ( CPU overload, telecom line bandwidth).
Thanks again
Christian
Mike Walsh <Mike.Walsh@reliastar.com>@tkg.com le 2001-10-24 14:14:16
Veuillez répondre à IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
Envoyé par : owner-nv-l@tkg.com
Pour : IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
cc :
Objet : Re: [NV-L] NV_L What should I use Netview or Cisco Works ? both
Christian,
I have both deployed and setup. My main monitoring tool is the Netview,
but
with the ciscoworks integration I gain a lot of problem determination
capability along with configuration backup and change analysis. Also the
ability to fully control my Cisco devices from a central point. If you
have a
very small network, or prefer to control the routers manually from the
command
line then just look at Netview. Your choice, but I wouldn't be without
either
one. They complement each other beautifully.
Mike
chuberdeau@avdl.com wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I have to do monitoring of cisco's equipment and telecommunication
> line bandwidth.
>
> Can I do it only with netview or should I purchase cisco works
"CWLMS-2.0".
>
> That what I already saw or understand is if something failed on the cisco
> router
> for example one power supply it will send a snmp trap to my console and
the
> mib
> allow me to interpret the message.
>
> About bandwidth monitoring or CPU I think I have to do a collection and
set
> some threshold.
>
> Can someone tell me if I m wrong ... or on the wrong track...
>
> Thank you very much
>
> Christian Huberdeau
> Management Tools
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
$RFC822.eml
Description: Binary data
|