To: | <nv-l@lists.tivoli.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [nv-l] incorrect interfaces |
From: | "Karl Prinelle" <Karl.Prinelle@elyzium.co.uk> |
Date: | Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:09:43 +0100 |
Reply-to: | <Karl.Prinelle@elyzium.co.uk> |
Hi
list,
NV 7.1.2, w2k
sp2
I'm having trouble
with a set of devices which are Wellfleet series 7 routers. Each device
has the following interfaces;
isdn
backup
10.64.231.254 (lan
ethernet)
10.67.28.2 (wan) (single interface
card, multiple addresses)
10.68.28.2 (wan) (single interface
card, multiple addresses)
the two x.x.x.2 frame-streams come up to
different sites which themselves are connected - they're just dr routes.
It's the route cost that controls which route is used - 1/2 the estate is one
way, half the other. I've checked through
telnet and the lan/wan interfaces are up, & the isdn is down (a good
thing).
In NetView, it has
discovered the device, but is showing;
10.67.28.2 as down
10.68.28.2 is up
0.0.0.0 is up
(I'm
assuming that's what it thinks the isdn line is on).
10.64.231.254 is up
Demand poll returns
the same thing as what netview can see - it thinks one of the frame interfaces
has an Oper status of down, but admin status of up.
If I use the snmp
browser it shows me that there are 3 interfaces & they are all up. The
descriptions of the interfaces say they are one ethernet and two
frame-stream.
Anyone got any
thoughts about how to convince NV to agree with the router & what is that
0.0.0.0 interface???
Many thanks in
advance
Karl
Karl Prinelle
Tivoli Certified
Consultant
Elyzium Ltd
Enterprise Systems Management
Consultants
Mobile: +44 (0)7813 189198
Email: Karl.Prinelle@elyzium.co.uk
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elyzium Disclaimer: This email transmission is confidential and intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or disseminate the information, or take any action in reliance of it. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of any organisation or employer. If you have received this message in error, do not open any attachment but please notify the sender (above) deleting this message from your system. Please rely on your own virus check no responsibility is taken by the sender for any damage rising out of any bug or virus infection. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Netview on Windows, Jane Curry |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Netview on Windows - netmon -a equivalent, Jane Curry |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Unsubscribing From The List, Vince_Rosso |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Netview on Windows - netmon -a equivalent, Jane Curry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web