To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [nv-l] Re: DNS in a distributed environment |
From: | cfrantse@csc.com |
Date: | Tue, 19 Nov 2002 16:54:29 +0100 |
About CNAT, the main problem as we see it is that customers are using networks such as 172.16.0.0/16. This means we have to have a huge adress space to be able to cover all customers since we have a policy that states that no RFC1918 address space shall be imported into the management network. I haven't used CNAT personally, only read the documentation so maybe I have missed something? Christian Frantsen GIS/NES CSC, Computer Sciences Corporation Jonkoping, Sweden |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Changing label of node, James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Netview map on TEC event, Jane Curry |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Re: DNS in a distributed environment, James Shanks |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Re: DNS in a distributed environment, Todd H. |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web