nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

[nv-l] failure notice

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: [nv-l] failure notice
From: "Christopher J Petrina" <cjp8@meadwestvaco.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:48:13 -0500
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:54:56 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

----- Forwarded by Christopher J Petrina/Corporate/Mead on 02/12/2004 02:47 PM -----
MAILER-DAEMON@messagelabs.com

02/12/2004 02:27 PM

       
        To:        cjp8@meadwestvaco.com
        cc:        
        Subject:        failure notice




Ello all,
ENV:
netview 7.1.4   AIX 5.2
New Node Discovery = OFF

If I use loadhosts to load new devices into the objects directory, is
there any real sense in putlting them into a seedfile.  A script runs
nightly  to compare the current device file with a new one if there are
newer devices in the new file, it creatres a loadhost script that places
them into the objects directory.  With this what would be the reason to
place them in the seedfile?

Thanks
-Chris Petrina


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [nv-l] failure notice, Christopher J Petrina <=

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web