| To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [nv-l] failure notice |
| From: | "Christopher J Petrina" <cjp8@meadwestvaco.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:48:13 -0500 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:54:56 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
| Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
| Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
|
----- Forwarded by Christopher J Petrina/Corporate/Mead on 02/12/2004 02:47 PM -----
Ello all, ENV: netview 7.1.4 AIX 5.2 New Node Discovery = OFF If I use loadhosts to load new devices into the objects directory, is there any real sense in putlting them into a seedfile. A script runs nightly to compare the current device file with a new one if there are newer devices in the new file, it creatres a loadhost script that places them into the objects directory. With this what would be the reason to place them in the seedfile? Thanks -Chris Petrina |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [nv-l] Somewhat off topic: Question about OID for Cisco NAM (Network Analysis Module), Alan E. Hennis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Cisco MIBs do not work on switches, Stringfellow, William |
| Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Somewhat off topic: Question about OID for Cisco NAM (Network Analysis Module), Alan E. Hennis |
| Next by Thread: | [nv-l] trapd.log, Mohammed Quayum |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web