To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [nv-l] Seedfile entries not being discovered |
From: | "Christopher J Petrina" <cjp8@meadwestvaco.com> |
Date: | Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:08:22 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:29:46 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
I have seen this now for awhile. I have ip addresses in the seed file that are not being discovered. Theya re valid and pingable IP addresses. I reviewed the netmon.trace log and it shows both a sending and a receiving of a ping from 10.213.1.6 but nothing else. When I do an ovtopodump | grep 10.213.1.6 returns no value either. I ahve seen this in many of the IP addresses. All of which have basically the same entries in netmon.trace they are sent a ping they return the answer and then nothing more comes of these devices. These are by the way L3 switches/Router ip addresses. I never thought anything of it since finding devices via a seedfile is a very core level of Netview and never have I heard of Netview not finding a device in the seedfile when it was alive. So Ithought it could be the way in whcih I was discovering them. But this just does not seem to make sense to me. Any h! elp? it is a fairly big seedfile as we are not doing auto discovery. We only want to discover what is in the seedfile. Chris Petrina |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] networks with a 0 in them, Christopher J Petrina |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Seedfile entries not being discovered, Barr, Scott |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] networks with a 0 in them, Christopher J Petrina |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Seedfile entries not being discovered, Barr, Scott |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web