To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Bandwidth usage Benchamrk |
From: | James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:55:28 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 03 Mar 2004 15:22:14 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <20040303005231.22941.qmail@web60704.mail.yahoo.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
First, I have no benchmarks, though you can open a problem to NetView Support and see whether they have anything they can share with you. Or you can look for white papers and other sources out on http://www-306.ibm.com/software/tivoli/products/netview/ The only tuning for polling you can do is xnmsnmpconf. The rule of thumb is don't set your polling intervals so short and your retries so high that they overlap. You determine the collection rate and the amount of data collected for Data Collection yourself. Again the rule of thumb is don't ask for too much too quickly. And I would observe that the amount of bandwidth for any of this depends upon your network and what you ask for. So you could try it and get a benchmark of your own with snoop or an iptrace in a very short time. Finally, NetView does not waste bandwidth unless you tell him to . Use a seed file to restrict discovery to just those nodes you want to manage or unmanage them once the unimportant ones have been discovered. Don't collect data unless you really intend to do something with it. And use RFI. It reduces pointless polling by netmon when a network has become occluded. More than likely you will waste a lot more bandwidth than NetView ever will by configuring your routers and switches to send pointless traps to NetView every other second. That is the biggest waste of bandwidth in most shops. The best thing you can do, in my opinion, is to start a policy that no trap is to be sent to NetView unless someone at the management station is going to actually do something with it when it arrives. That's how you can prevent a trap storm and save your bandwidth. James Shanks Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
Hi Folks, Q1: Anybody has any benchmarks on the following: 1- Average Bandwidth usage by NV for managing 1000 Nodes 2- Average Bandwidth usage for a Data Collection at a 15 min interval 3- Average Bandwidth usage for status polling 4- Average Bandwidth usage for initial discovery 5- Average Bandwidth usage for rediscovery Q2: Any Hint or advice on how to minimize or prevent wastage of Bandwidth by netview? Really appreciated.
Post your free ad now! Yahoo! Canada Personals
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] NV on Linux, Paul |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] Secure Comunication with Windows, Fernandez, Rick |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Bandwidth usage Benchamrk, Meyos Yemveng |
Next by Thread: | [nv-l] Adding Notes to received events, Meyos Yemveng |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web