nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces

To: <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces
From: "Klingensmith, Debra L." <DKling2@alleghenyenergy.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:03:32 -0500
Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:33:19 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Thread-index: AcQKsbKl6Z4TlAgJQZyrNW8A4gLPdgADJ1IAAAA6AWA=
Thread-topic: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces

Doing the netmon –y worked well in my case, because I was only having problems with selected interfaces on the device. I did not want to delete the whole device. I have only implemented this on one device so far, to see if it will truly work, but so far it looks good.

 

Here is what I did. I put the interfaces in the netmon.seed with the $ in front as suggested. The interfaces in question however do not have snmp open to them either, so in the snmp configuration I set the main interface up as a proxy for the troublesome interfaces, then executed the netmon –y command. The interfaces are now showing as up. Thanks for your help. This has been a problem area for me for a long time.

 

Debra L. Klingensmith

Network Specialist

Allegheny Energy

phone: (724) 830-5881

email: dkling2@alleghenyenergy.com

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Barr, Scott [mailto:Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com]
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 1:52 PM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces

 

I have yet to see an ovtopodump -rl <resourcename> indicate it switched from ICMP polling to SNMP polling. If it works, you can't prove it by me. I trust your judgement however, so if you say it should work I believe it should work without deleting. I just can't claim to have seen it work. Probably a timing thing, if I was patient it probably would work. But on a device that isn't being managed properly, so who cares if it's discovered, I just delete and rediscover it.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]On Behalf Of James Shanks
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 10:55 AM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces


Why would you delete and rediscover them?  Just change the seed file and reload it (netmon -y) or restart netmon and that should have the same effect.

James Shanks
Level 3 Support  for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group


"Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

03/15/2004 11:25 AM

Please respond to
nv-l

To

<nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>

cc

 

Subject

RE: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces

 

 

 




If you use SNMP polling NetView will not need to ping them - delete from topology and put them in the seed file with a "$" sign:

mypix.mydomain.com
$mypix.mydomain.com

They will be managed and not pinged.


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]On
Behalf Of Klingensmith, Debra L.
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 10:16 AM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: [nv-l] Unmanaged interfaces


I have interfaces on Sidewinder devices and PIX firewalls that are not able to be pinged. The interfaces are found on the device when the device is polled. If I delete the interfaces they reappear the next time the device is polled. I have tried adding them as negative entries in netmon.seed but that has no affect. If I set them as unmanaged or acknowledged they are fine for a while but will eventually become managed and show as down. I am running Netview 7.1.3 on AIX 5.1. Any suggestions?

Debra L. Klingensmith
Network Specialist
Allegheny Energy
phone: (724) 830-5881
email: dkling2@alleghenyenergy.com




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web