To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Solaris Bad PDU Type |
From: | James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Thu, 15 Apr 2004 13:20:10 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:27:57 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <91D03459CD3BE04DB5C9894069B25234515B73@omaexch03.csg.csgsystems.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Where did you see this message? In the log for snmpdx? Then the problem is that someone sent an SNMP V1 trap (pdu type 0x'a4') to port 161, where snmpdx is listening, rather than to port 162, where trapd is listening. If it happens frequently then you might be able to capture it with snoop. If in the trapd.log, then as Paul said, perhaps it is a badly formatted trap. In the latter case, you might be able to capture it by running trapd with the -x option and starting the trapd trace (trapd -T from the command line toggles it). But snoop should work here too. It's just a matter of what port you want to snoop 161 or 162 udp. James Shanks Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
I remember seeing this mentioned in the forum somewhere but can't find it in the archives. Does anyone know what this message means: <hostname> /usr/lib/snmp/snmpdx: [ID 702911 daemon.error] bad PDU type (0xa4) received from <devicename>
Solaris 2.8 NetView v7.1.4
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Solaris Bad PDU Type, Paul |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] locations, ray . smith |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Solaris Bad PDU Type, Paul |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Solaris Bad PDU Type, Barr, Scott |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web