nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

[nv-l] itsl2_reports output format?

To: <nv-l@lists.tivoli.com>
Subject: [nv-l] itsl2_reports output format?
From: "Karl Prinelle" <Karl.Prinelle@elyzium.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 17:15:20 +0100
Delivery-date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 17:28:31 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Thread-index: AcRPBiAa1qyZfM2qRJCaedvsXaxP+w==
Hi list,
 
nv 7.1.4+fp1, sa 1.2.1, linux rh es 2.1, HP Procurve 2524 with single vlan called VLAN1.
 
I'm doing a little testing with switch analyser & although the brain maybe clogged by hayfever I can't find a document that describes the output from "ITSL2_reports -r layer2 -d".  If anyone can point me to doc's on this that would be great.  Just in case below is the output I'm getting;
 
192.168.1.254/192.168.1.254
    [2/2/0.0.0.0] ===>
        [jaws-w2k/192.168.1.11 - /0/192.168.1.11]
 
    [5/5/0.0.0.0] ===>
        [172.16.1.1/172.16.1.1 - eth1/3/192.168.1.59]
        [192.168.1.1/192.168.1.1 - /0/192.168.1.1] *
        [tiree-w2k3/192.168.1.10 - /0/192.168.1.10]
        [ws01/192.168.1.14 - /0/192.168.1.14] *
 

* This interface has been placed on the layer 2 segment by "default" and
  is not necessarily connected to the specified port.
192.168.1.1 is a router which is connect to an HP Procurve 2524 (192.168.1.254 mgmt ip) on port 24 of the switch
192.168.1.14 is a pc attached to port 13 of the switch
172.16.1.1 & 192.168.1.59 are interfaces on a linux router
172.16.1.202 is the netview server    
The Linux router and netview server are both vmware images running on the host 192.168.1.10
 
A few questions to get me going....;
    192.168.1.254/192.168.1.254    => what is this telling me?  My switch ipaddr is 192.168.1.254 - but why print it twice?
    [2/2/0.0.0.0]    =>  Just plain confused.  This device is in port 2 of my switch, but why print that twice? What's the 0.0.0.0?
    [5/5/0.0.0.0] => is there anything I can do to remove the * from 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.14 which are both real machines plugged into different ports on the switch & get them reporting the correct port numbers?
 
Any help much appreciated
 
K
 
 

 

 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web