To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [nv-l] rfc1213-mib2 traps? |
From: | "Scherting, Mark" <mscherting@state.mt.us> |
Date: | Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:10:24 -0600 |
Delivery-date: | Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:25:42 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Hi all,
I'm looking for a mib that
I can get some trap definitons from in hopes that I won't have to create a new
enterprise and definitions. I'm receiving the following traps from Cisco
Aironet 350 bridges but there are no trap definitions in rfc1213-mib-II where
these oid's are defined. Not only are these traps annoying, but they are
not very informative. Should I just tell all these devices to not send any
more traps?
1089734377 2 Tue Jul 13 09:59:37 2004 msp-air-tower2.nms.state.mt.us ? NO FMT IN TRAPD.CONF: .0.0 (0.0) generic:2 specific:0 args(2): [1] mgmt.mib-2.interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifIndex.1 (Integer): 1 1089734377 2 Tue Jul 13 09:59:37 2004 msp-air-tower2.nms.state.mt.us ? [2] mgmt.mib-2.interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifDescr.1 (OctetString): fec0 AND/OR:
1089734377 2 Tue Jul 13 09:59:37 2004 msp-air-tower2.nms.state.mt.us ? NO FMT IN TRAPD.CONF: .0.0 (0.0) generic:2 specific:0 args(2): [1] mgmt.mib-2.interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifIndex.10 (Integer): 10 1089734377 2 Tue Jul 13 09:59:37 2004 msp-air-tower2.nms.state.mt.us ? [2] mgmt.mib-2.interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifDescr.10 (OctetString): br10 Thanks!
Mark Scherting |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Point to Point link color status change, Peter . Ingleson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] rfc1213-mib2 traps?, James Shanks |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Point to Point link color status change, Peter . Ingleson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] rfc1213-mib2 traps?, James Shanks |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web