| To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Demand poll on newly added router causes Router to be Deleted |
| From: | James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:16:33 -0400 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:31:34 +0100 |
| Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
| In-reply-to: | <A35515742711B147B00F268E99302002095FB8@ANPMB2.arinc.com> |
| Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
| Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
|
The traps only indicate what happened, not why. Have you tried getting a netmon trace? Start it from the command line, netmon -M -1, and then repeat the process. Then you can follow along in the netmon.trace file. James Shanks Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
All: I was summoned to the operations center to witness an obscure scenario. Following our procedures to discover a router (which we have run a million times in the past), we would add the router, perform a demand poll. When the demand poll was finished, the router would be deleted (through no action of my own) and I would get these traps (summarized): Interface Ethernet0/0 Deleted .1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.3.1
specific 58785793 Has anyone come across this issue before and
if so whats goin on here? Jason Allison
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [nv-l] Demand poll on newly added router causes Router to be Deleted, Allison, Jason (JALLISON) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Demand poll on newly added router causes Router to be Deleted, Barr, Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Demand poll on newly added router causes Router to be Deleted, Allison, Jason (JALLISON) |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Demand poll on newly added router causes Router to be Deleted, Barr, Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web