To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Re: multilink? (was no subject) |
From: | Netview Novice <netview_novice@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:00:48 -0700 (PDT) |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:15:54 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <OFE4FD4721.C2AB541A-ON87256EF2.00481BCC-85256EF2.0048BBE9@us.ibm.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Hi James,
Thanks for your reply.
To answer the first part of your mail, I guess probably the reason why we went for SQL database was because of the query part but then I am not too sure coz i wasnt with the organisation back then. The setup was done by IBM India and they said that netview could not generate reports of its own and hence recommended a software call WanInsight for report generation (real time and historical reports. Stuffs like reports for checking whether the vendor is meeting the SLA for link uptime etc..). We are now facing problems with this product and IBM and the Netsol(the company which made WanInsight) are both unable to solve the problem. I was wondering if there were similiar software which any one in the group was using so that we could evaluate and probably use it.
For the second part of your mail, you have answered my query regarding Multilink (My apologies, I was not aware of Metaconnections).
Thanks once again James.
Regards,
NN
James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> wrote:
Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] Re: multilink? (was no subject), James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] SNMP v2c, Qureshi, Fawad |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Re: multilink? (was no subject), James Shanks |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Re: multilink? (was no subject), Joe Fernandez |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web