Re: [nv-l] Mib2trap

[James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com>]

The SNMPv2-SMI is available in both
v1 and v2 flavors at the Cisco web site.  
ftp://ftp.cisco.com/pub/mibs/
It's also known other places by it's
RFC name , RFC1442. There's a simplified V1 version of it in /usr/OV/snmp_mibs/rfc1442v.smi



James Shanks
Level 3 Support  for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group

"Edwards, JT - ESM" <JEdwards3@wm.com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

09/21/2004 06:22 PM

Please respond to
nv-l

To	"'nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com'" <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
cc
Subject	[nv-l] Mib2trap

I am trying to integrate an app that uses SNMPv2 traps.

So far it looks like I am going to have a to take a LONG walk up the mib
tree to find all of the IMPORT dependencies to get this trap integrated.
Here is an except of the IMPORT definitions:

  TruthValue, DisplayString
         FROM SNMPv2-TC
      DisplayString
         FROM RFC1213-MIB
      enterprises, MODULE-IDENTITY, NOTIFICATION-TYPE, OBJECT-TYPE,
IpAddress, Gauge32, Counter32, TimeTicks
         FROM SNMPv2-SMI;

I have the snmpv2-tc and rfc1213 mibs in hand. Since I do not have the
snmpv2-smi mib, I tried to Gogglize my way to this particular mib. I found
out there are tons of snmpv2-smi mibs that vary. In my 7.1.4 FP1
installation, this particular mib was not included.

What should be my next step?

JT

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]On
Behalf Of Van Order, Drew (US - Hermitage)
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 4:23 PM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Netview and TEC Integration


I think you've got it Jane.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]
On Behalf Of Jane Curry
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 11:25 AM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Netview and TEC Integration


Hi John,
I'm not aware of any out-of-the-box integration for  Ack'ing in NetView
and getting automatic ACKs in TEC.  The simple (but I suspect WRONG
answer) is to forward NetView ACK TRAPs to TEC.  I think you will
find 
these are unconfigured by default in both trapd.conf and in TEC_ITS.rls.


The reason I suspect it is wrong (or at least, not quite right!) is that

this is what TEC sends to NetView in the Synchronization rules in 
netview.rls - you would then end up forwarding the ACK TRAP back to TEC
again........    Perhaps with an extra rule in TEC that filters
this ACK

TRAP out if it is a recent status change???  You'd then need a simple
TEC rule that changed the status of all recent events from the same node

/ interface, to ACK.

Just thinking off the top of my head....... anyone else?

Cheers,
Jane

John Altman wrote:

>Does anyone have the Netview and TEC integration working where you
can
>acknowlege devices within netview and have them update the TEC console
with
>the acknowledgement?  I have it working where we can acknowledge
an
event
>from the TEC and it will update the netview maps, but not both ways.
>
>
>
>John M. Altman III
>Ahold Information Services
>864-987-3102
>(Embedded image moved to file: pic26919.gif)
>IBM Certified Deployment Professional
>TEC V3.8 Network Management
>  
>

-- 
Tivoli Certified Consultant & Instructor
Skills 1st Limited, 2 Cedar Chase, Taplow, Bucks, SL6 0EU, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1628 782565
Copyright (c) 2004 Jane Curry <jane.curry@skills-1st.co.uk>.  All
rights
reserved.




This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.
 If
you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message.  Any
disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of
any
action based on it, is strictly prohibited.