To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Problems loading Extreme net MIBs and some other as well |
From: | James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:35:16 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:35:45 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <003f01c4d610$a3651cb0$1b0fa8c0@ad.mobtel.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
It's unlikely that anyone can give you all the assistance you need just by looking at the error messages. They would have to look at the MIBs as well, and try to reproduce the problem. I can give you some general hints and some suggestions, but I think that your best course of action is to open a problem to IBM Support and get them to assist you. You can send them your problem MIBs for analysis, as well as your MIB databases. I am forbidden to take customer problems directly from the list, but if you open a problem to IBM Support, then you can get expert help from someone, if not from me. General hints: (1) How to tell an SNMPv2 MIB from an SNMPv1 MIB. After the IMPORTS section, an SNMPv2 MIB starts with a MODULE-IDENTITY clause, while an SNMPv1 MIB does not. The MODULE-IDENTITY clause does not exist in SNMPv1. That's how you tell the difference between an SNMPv1 and an SNMPv2 MIB. (2) Look at the IMPORTS section in the MIB before you try to load it. All MIBs start with an IMPORTS section which tells you what other MIBs you need to load them properly. Generally speaking, you do not need to load any of the early RFCs, the ones with numbers lower than 1500 because those constructs are already built-in to the NetView loaders and browsers. The newer RFC's, the ones with numbers higher than 1500 you will almost certainly need. But the number one use for IMPORTS clause is so that you know what other VENDOR MIBs need to be loaded in order to resolve what's in the one you have. If you don't get the vendor MIBs mentioned in the IMPORTS section and load them first, then you will almost certainly get a "left over nodes" warning message such as the one you posted. That's the typical cause of that message, that the MIB databases does not have the anchor point for all of the elements that some other MIB requires. Another reason might be that the basic definition of the anchor point has a problem, but usually the issue is a missing pre-req. These latter syntax problems will never be in RFC's, they will be in vendor MIBs. Specific suggestions: How does this specifically apply to your situation? The "left over nodes" message is only a warning. That means that the MIB you tried to load in fact did load. But you were warned that not all of it could be resolved. If you did not immediately unload it, then, from that point on however, any other MIB you try to load will get the same warning message because the loader produces it while incorporating the new MIB into the entire MIB database. That's why you see the high line number (185827). The problem is already in the MIB database, and not in the MIB you are trying to load; in this case the TOKEN-RING-RMON-MIB.txt, but in some previous MIB you already loaded. How can you find out what MIB that is? Each MIB loader has both a text file and a binary file. The SNMPv1 loader, xnmloadmib, has /usr/OV/conf/snmpmib (text file) and /usr/OV/conf/snmpmib.bin (binary file). The SNMPv1/SNMPv2 loader, xnmloadmib2, /usr/OV/conf/snmpv2mib (text file) and /usr/OV/conf/snmpv2mib.bin (binary file). To find what MIB is causing your error, browse the text file for that loader and find out what MIB contains the first clause in the warning message. Locate the definition for Left-over node rptrInfoResetEvent ::= { 5 } (0) and then scroll up until you find the keyword BEGIN that indicates the start of the MIB. If you unload that MIB, then your warning messages should go away. But this requires care because if you have been ignoring this message and have loaded many new MIBs already, you may have introduced new dependencies that will cause new warnings when you unload your problem MIB. Compiling MIBs is very much like compiling a program. It is best to resolve the first error you come to rather than to try to continue. Now based upon what I know about the native NetView MIB loaders, the fact that this error message has this peculiar value at the end of each line, "(0)", indicates to me that the MIB which contains it has a syntax problem that our loader cannot resolve. Would that be the entityXMIB? You can try using the process I just outlined to determine that and remove it from the database. Finally, I have to say once again that MIBs are like program source code, and each MIB compiler has different syntactical requirements depending on how they are built. Just as some program compilers are more picky about spaces and punctuation, so also some MIB compilers are pickier than others about the same things. Are some vendors don't compile their MIBs at all before shipping them. They just think they have done it right. So there are no automatic tools to correct MIB syntax. What you need is experience. Which is why a call to IBM Support is in order when you cannot figure it out for yourself. You can learn from them.
Hi all, I am a newbie to Netview world, so, please, do not hesitate to correct me. I have a lot of problems loading MIBs, most of which are down to some problems in the MIBs themselves. Some, however, are not. I have used a way recomended on this list to tell if the file is v2 or v1. So far I have not been able to load any of the v2 files, and you can se the output bellow: bash-2.05b# xnmloadmib2 -load /usr/mibs/standards/TOKEN-RING-RMON-MIB.txt -replace Warning: This entry has no sub-identifier(entityXMIB): On or around line 185827 of the snmpv2mib file. Warning: The mib description doesn't seem to be consistent. Some nodes couldn't be linked under the "iso" tree. These nodes are left: Left-over node rptrInfoResetEvent ::= { 5 } (0) Left-over node rptrInfoHealth ::= { 4 } (0) Left-over node rptrResetEvent ::= { 3 } (0) Left-over node rptrGroupChange ::= { 2 } (0) Left-over node rptrHealth ::= { 1 } (0) Left-over node dot1xSuppMaxStart ::= { dot1xSuppConfigEntry 5 } (1) Left-over node dot1xSuppStartPeriod ::= { dot1xSuppConfigEntry 4 } (1) Left-over node dot1xSuppAuthPeriod ::= { dot1xSuppConfigEntry 3 } (1)................. I have these leftover nodes more than 1000... I have tried to load all v2 CISCO mibs.... I have tried also all the standard v2 mibs... If you say that I have to start over, I will do that gladly... On the other hand, below is another one, for Extreme networks. I can not see any problems with the file. I have tried with the official one (from Extreme net) and the one from ByteSphere's http://www.oidview.com/mibs/detail.html bash-2.05b# xnmloadmib2 -load /usr/mibs/Enterprises/Extreme\ Networks\ Inc/ExtremeWare\ -\ Extreme\ 7.2.0\ MIB/extreme_m1.mib -replace Warning: This entry has no sub-identifier(entityXMIB): On or around line 185827 of the snmpv2mib file. Error detected while loading MIB File: /usr/mibs/Enterprises/Extreme Networks Inc/ExtremeWare - Extreme 7.2.0 MIB/extreme_m1.mib. This MIB cannot be loaded until the following problem is corrected: Bad format of optional clauses(}): On or around line 6532 Bad parse of OBJECT-TYPE: On or around line 6532 Mib table is bad. Since, I will, probably have to start changing mibs, do you have any tools (freeware if possible, we have bought Tivoli Netview and TEC :)) which could help me, or some links where I could find the exact definition for a MIB file (no RFCs please, I have tried, trust me, I do not have the time for that. I hope that I am not too picky. In the end: We are running NetView 7.1.4 on AIX 5.2L bash-2.05b$ uname -a AIX tivoli 2 5 005D6ACC4C00 Thank you all for your patience with this e-mail. Have a nice day. Kind Regards, Vladan Milosevic Senior Engineer IP Network and Services Information Technology Division 063 MOBTEL Srbija tel. +381 11 30 13 106 fax +381 11 30 13 452 GSM +381 63 230 973 e-mail: vladan.milosevic@mobtel.co.yu |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] Problems loading Extreme net MIBs and some other as well, Vladan Milosevic |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Problems loading Extreme net MIBs and some other as we ll, Bursik, Scott {PBSG} |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Problems loading Extreme net MIBs and some other as well, Vladan Milosevic |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Problems loading Extreme net MIBs and some other as well, Vladan Milosevic |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web