To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Netview+Tivoli Endpoint or Managed node? |
From: | wolfgang.bergbauer@attglobal.net |
Date: | Thu, 16 Dec 2004 10:49:43 +0100 |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:50:20 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <1103162262.6737.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Hi Scot, If you do not use the Database functionality of Netview which is based on RIM (e.g. store SNMP collect information in a RDBMS) just install it standalone. I think all the other features are more cosmetic. But even if you install it standalone and you later on need the Framework for whatever reason, it is not a bit deal to reinstall it without loosing your customizations. Kind regards, Wolfgang ------------------------------------------------------------------ Wolfgang Bergbauer Network and System Management Consultant Cell phone: +49 172 534 9131 E-mail: wolfgang.bergbauer@attglobal.net
Hi all; I scanned the list for the ans. so forgive me if this is a repost. If I'm installing a Netview for use with TEC/TMF what advantages are there to making that host a Tivoli managed node? Windows Netview Unix TMR Linux/Windows Desktops/TEC_Consoles. -- Scot <scotrn@cox.net> |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] Netview+Tivoli Endpoint or Managed node?, Scot |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Routers in Isolated Subnet, SIXFC |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Netview+Tivoli Endpoint or Managed node?, Scot |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Netview+Tivoli Endpoint or Managed node?, Paul |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web