To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] TEC Forwarding - persistent? |
From: | James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:47:45 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:48:14 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <83B1FCCE169AD74FBAC555C3B6E7B5770D8A81C4@pfgdsmmbx004.principalusa.corp.principal.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Actually, you are asking the wrong folks. The session is established using the tec_create_handle call in the TEC EEIF library. So how that is done is TEC issue, not a NetView one.
Hi. We're running NV 7.1.4 on AIX 5.1. We forward events to TEC and specify a DNS name for the TEC server. Our TEC folks are working on a solution whereby they can use DDNS to update the TEC server entry and point it from the broken server to the backup server. Does anybody know if we'll have to touch Netview in some way when they do that? I suspect that NV only looks up the name when nvserverd starts and will use that until a "nvtecia -reload" is performed, or the daemon is bounced. I'm not in a good position to test this today, so if somebody knows off-hand, that would be really helpful. Thanks! Craig -----Message Disclaimer----- This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by reply email to Connect@principal.com and delete or destroy all copies of the original message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from the Principal Financial Group or any of its member companies may be retained as required by law or regulation. Nothing in this message is intended to constitute an Electronic signature for purposes of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA) or the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act ("E-Sign") unless a specific statement to the contrary is included in this message. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] TEC Forwarding - persistent?, Treptow, Craig |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] TEC Forwarding - persistent?, Treptow, Craig |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] TEC Forwarding - persistent?, Treptow, Craig |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] TEC Forwarding - persistent?, Treptow, Craig |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web