Are any traps getting through from NetView to TEC?? I would start by
testing with the standard TEC_ITS.rs ruleset which will forward standard
NetView node/interface/router up/down/marginal/unreachable events,
regardless of the name of the device. If you can see these, then you at
least know that the basic NetView-to-TEC mechanism is working.
Then work on the NetView ruleset to refine the traps to forward to TEC.
Is this a Windows or Unix NetView? Either way, ensure that the relevant
TEC adapter (nvserverd on Unix; tecad_nv6k for Win) is configured with
your ruleset. I personally would also ensure that the TEC adapter
configuration has State Correlation off and a non-TME communications
mechanism, unless you explicitly need these features.
Martina Haseneder wrote:
Hi people out there,
in the NV-Map there are the nodes cpmv01 and
AND the NV-Server receives traps in trapd.log from the same nodes but
different addresses which are not in the nv-Map
cpm01 and cpm02 (no snmp-read allowed)
Now I need to forward all these traps to TEC.
How could the ruleset look like?
I've tried a ruleset with the following, but unfortunately it didn't work:
1) QuerySmartSet NodeList (includes cpmv01 and cpmv02)
2) EventAttribute Origin is equal to IP-Adress of cpm01
3) EventAttribute Origin is equal to IP-Adress of cpm02
3) EventAttribute EnterpriseID is equal to EnterpriseID_of_cbsHwTraps
During the weekend traps happened but they did not make the way to TEC.
Thanks a lot for any ideas
Tivoli Certified Consultant & Instructor
Skills 1st Limited, 2 Cedar Chase, Taplow, Bucks, SL6 0EU, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1628 782565
Copyright (c) 2005 Jane Curry <email@example.com>. All rights