Réf. : [nv-l] Ciscoworks Netview Integration

nv-l

Réf. : [nv-l] Ciscoworks Netview Integration

To:	nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject:	Réf. : [nv-l] Ciscoworks Netview Integration
From:	thierry.van-mol@ciev.vd.ch
Date:	Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:37:27 +0200
Delivery-date:	Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:38:19 +0100
Envelope-to:	nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
In-reply-to:	<20050615223939.50088.qmail@web40429.mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to:	nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender:	owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

Just beware that the new CiscoWorks LMS 2.5 brings an undocumented
incompatibility
with Netview if you try to install them on the same box.

I used to run Netview and CW2000 on the same Solaris box. I tried to
upgrade
to LMS 2.5, and surprise, one of the CiscoWorks DFM daemons tries to use
the port 8888, which is used by Netview. This is not documented, and
until now, Cisco TAC could not provide a workaraound.

Thierry

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[nv-l] Ciscoworks Netview Integration, X X Re: [nv-l] Ciscoworks Netview Integration, usman . taokeer Réf. : [nv-l] Ciscoworks Netview Integration, thierry . van-mol <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [nv-l] Upgrade from standalone to server?, Jan Erik Hoel
Next by Date:	Re: [nv-l] Web Console:Switch Management:Inactive Port, Oliver Bruchhaeuser
Previous by Thread:	Re: [nv-l] Ciscoworks Netview Integration, usman . taokeer
Next by Thread:	[nv-l] mib2trap: SUMMARY line too long ?, Francis Boeykens
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd