To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] PIX interface issues |
From: | Michael_Noonkesser@bluecrossmn.com |
Date: | Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:38:38 -0600 |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:39:20 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <OF63C68D8D.DB80D8BB-ONC125713A.003A8DA3-C125713A.003A9BE8@fr.ibm.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
No I do not. Regards, Mike Noonkesser Office 651-662-1012 Fax 651-662-2279
Hi, Have you another map , other than "default" ? Cordialement , Franck MERCIER PS Specialist (Tivoli Support) Information Technology Services France Mailto : franck.mercier@fr.ibm.com *.. the only way to do great work is to love what you do .. * Michael_Noonkesse r@bluecrossmn.com Sent by: To owner-nv-l@lists. nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com us.ibm.com cc Subject 21/03/2006 18:26 [nv-l] PIX interface issues Please respond to nv-l Hi list Netview 7.1.3 FP4 Solaris 2.8 I am having great difficulty getting one of my Cisco PIX firewalls to cooperate. Scenario: I have the inside interface as xxx.xxx.xxx.10 and external as xxx.xxx.xxx.11 These two are fine and report up always. I have 6 additional interfaces on each side of the firewall. This is the problem, these interfaces come and go almost daily(not all at once) for whatever reason, when they drop they report as their internal or external interface IP. Either .10 or .11 respectively. I have unmanaged them all ( these 12 additional ) they still report as down to Netview as the .10 or .11 interface as being down. I have them designated as do not discover in the seed file,editing it directly with vi and adding a ! in front of all these interfaces except for the primaries .10 and .11. I have added the > character in front of these two primaries as well. I have deleted everything from the maps via Edit>delete>object>from all submaps numerous times to no avail The security folks are becoming a bit miffed at me when they get paged on this for no apparent reason. ANY suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Mike Noonkesser ---------------------------- Important news about email communications: If our business rules identify sensitive information, you will receive a ZixMail Secure Message with a link to view your message. First-time recipients will be asked to create a password before they are granted access. To learn more about ZixMail, ZixCorp Secure Email Message Center, and other ZixCorp offerings, please go to http://userawareness.zixcorp.com/secure4/index.php ---------------------------- The information contained in this communication may be confidential, and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please return it to the sender immediately and delete the original message and any copy of it from your computer system. If you have any questions concerning this message, please contact the sender. Unencrypted, unauthenticated Internet e-mail is inherently insecure. Internet messages may be corrupted or incomplete, or may incorrectly identify the sender.
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] PIX interface issues, Franck Mercier |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] PIX interface issues, Chance, Larry |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] PIX interface issues, Franck Mercier |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] PIX interface issues, Chance, Larry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web