[NV-L] servmon is 1 hour behind

To:	"Tivoli NetView Discussions" <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
Subject:	[NV-L] servmon is 1 hour behind
From:	"Martina Singer" <martina.singer@datev.de>
Date:	Thu, 7 Sep 2006 11:17:16 +0200
Delivery-date:	Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:18:15 +0100
Envelope-to:	nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
List-help:	<mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com>
List-post:	<mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to:	Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com>
Sender:	nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com

Hi list,

my UNIX-Server uses the right time!!!

But when I make a "tail -f" on the servmon.log the new entries have a time-stamp one our behind.

The other netview-logs seem all right.

Does the servmon use an own time?

Greetings

Martina

_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to 
internal IBM'ers only)

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[NV-L] servmon is 1 hour behind, Martina Singer <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [NV-L] xnmcollect throws away values?, Martina Singer
Next by Date:	Re: [NV-L] xnmcollect throws away values?, Leslie Clark
Previous by Thread:	[NV-L] xnmcollect throws away values?, Martina Singer
Next by Thread:	[NV-L] Install 7.1.3 on AIX 5.2, mikemillion2000
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]