* James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> [2007:03:20:07:53:48-0400] scribed: > Offhand, I have no idea. What platform? What level of NetView code? MS Windows Server 2003; SP1 NV v7.1.4; FP 4 > Does this occur for all traps regarding this device or just some of > them? That is difficult, and problematic, to answer definitively. When we first setup this NV/TEC integration, we saw some of this; and we have TEC rules that log this behaviour. I have been meaning to chase this down, and fix it for quite awhile; but, NOW our NOC users have complained about this, and I need to resolve it. Clearly, most of these nodes DO repeat this errant behaviour. Whether or not they ever send properly configured events to TEC, I cannot say ;< > NetView traps or vendor traps? Netview. Notice, these SAME Netview events ARE properly formatted for >99% of nodes. > Any formatting differences in trapd.conf (UNIX) or tecad_nv6k.cds > (Windows). Differences between what and what? Thank you, for your participation in this matter. > James Shanks > Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows > Network Availability Management > Network Management - Development > Tivoli Software, IBM Corp > > > > Michael D Schleif <mds@helices.org> > Sent by: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com > 03/19/2007 10:41 AM > Please respond to > Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> > > > To nv-l mailing list <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> > > Subject [NV-L] NV sending FQDN to TEC in IP address field ??? > > [1] What can cause Netview to send either FQDN, or Selection Name in the > origin (IP address) slot, when forwarding events to TEC? > > [2] Out of ~9,000 nodes, this anomaly occurs <1% of nodes. > > [3] How can we correct this condition? > > > Examples: > ========= > > [A] > d:\>ovobjprint -s host.example.org > OBJECTID SELECTION NAME > > OBJECT: 901159 > > FIELD ID FIELD NAME FIELD VALUE > 10 Selection Name "host.example.org" > 11 IP Hostname "host.example.org" > 14 OVW Maps Exists 1 > 15 OVW Maps Managed 1 > 75 IP Status Normal(2) > 78 isIPRouter FALSE > 101 IP Name "host.example.org" > 105 vendor IBM(28) > 117 isNode TRUE > 119 isComputer TRUE > 120 isConnector FALSE > 122 isBridge FALSE > 123 isRouter FALSE > 124 isHub FALSE > 129 isWorkstation TRUE > 145 isDHCPClient FALSE > 146 hasBadOID FALSE > 147 hasInconsistentSubnetMask FALSE > 149 isMLM FALSE > 151 isIP TRUE > 174 isSNMPSupported TRUE > 176 SNMP sysDescr "IBM PowerPC > CHRP Computer > Machine Type: > 0x0800004c Processor id: 00CAD51E4C00 > Base > Operating System Runtime AIX version: 05.03.0000.0050 > TCP/IP Client > Support version: 05.03.0000.0053" > 177 SNMP sysLocation "" > 178 SNMP sysContact "" > 179 SNMP sysObjectID "1.3.6.1.4.1.2.3.1.2.1.1.3" > 180 SNMPAgent IBM RS/6000 > 4.1(200) > 186 SNMP ipAddress "9.8.106.106" > 219 TopM Interface Count 2 > 225 TopM Interface List "en1; Up > 9.8.106.106 255.255.254.0 0x00145EC63299 ieee 802.3 csmacd " > "en0; Up > 192.168.88.171 255.255.252.0 0x00145EC63298 ieee 802.3 csmacd " > 248 XXMAP Protocol List "IP" > > > [B] > d:\>ovobjprint -s S10B2DBD > OBJECTID SELECTION NAME > > OBJECT: 899899 > > FIELD ID FIELD NAME FIELD VALUE > 10 Selection Name "S10B2DBD" > 11 IP Hostname "S10B2DBD" > 14 OVW Maps Exists 1 > 15 OVW Maps Managed 1 > 75 IP Status Normal(2) > 78 isIPRouter FALSE > 101 IP Name "S10B2DBD" > 105 vendor IBM(28) > 117 isNode TRUE > 119 isComputer TRUE > 120 isConnector FALSE > 122 isBridge FALSE > 123 isRouter FALSE > 124 isHub FALSE > 130 isMini TRUE > 145 isDHCPClient FALSE > 146 hasBadOID FALSE > 147 hasInconsistentSubnetMask FALSE > 149 isMLM FALSE > 151 isIP TRUE > 174 isSNMPSupported TRUE > 176 SNMP sysDescr "IBM OS/400 > V5R3M0" > 177 SNMP sysLocation "" > 178 SNMP sysContact "" > 179 SNMP sysObjectID "1.3.6.1.4.1.2.6.11" > 180 SNMPAgent IBM > AS/400(193) > 186 SNMP ipAddress "9.8.44.139" > 219 TopM Interface Count 1 > 225 TopM Interface List "ETHLINE1 Up > 9.8.44.139 255.255.255.0 0x00096B6529BF ethernet csmacd " > 248 XXMAP Protocol List "IP" -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237 - Dare to fix things before they break . . . - Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . --
signature.asc _______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [NV-L] SNMP Collector configuration GUI wont function., Rytkinen Rauno |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [NV-L] mib file to document netview internal traps, Francois Le Hir |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [NV-L] NV sending FQDN to TEC in IP address field ???, James Shanks |
Next by Thread: | Re: [NV-L] NV sending FQDN to TEC in IP address field ???, James Shanks |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web