To: | "Tivoli NetView Discussions" <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [NV-L] Hsrp issue |
From: | "Kain, Becki \(B.\)" <bkain1@ford.com> |
Date: | Thu, 17 May 2007 12:41:32 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 17 May 2007 17:51:20 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Hop-count: | 1 |
In-reply-to: | <714EFC7999B7A640A33F0A9E5D8895120403CA9B@uscnt0495.us.deloitte.com> |
List-help: | <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=help> |
List-id: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l.lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-post: | <mailto:nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
List-subscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l>, <mailto:nv-l-request@lists.ca.ibm.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Reply-to: | Tivoli NetView Discussions <nv-l@lists.ca.ibm.com> |
Sender: | nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com |
Thread-index: | AceX7UulXFeiUnTJR4eXnyPzkx6ongAABUowACz36aAAAD23EA== |
Thread-topic: | [NV-L] Hsrp issue |
we don't have a test machine to test it out but
thanks
From: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com [mailto:nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Van Order, Drew (US - Hermitage) Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:36 PM To: Tivoli NetView Discussions Subject: RE: [NV-L] Hsrp issue Make the move to 7.1.5, it's worth it for the HSRP
improvements alone. Our upgrade went very smoothly, yours should
too!
--Drew From: Kain, Becki (B.) [mailto:bkain1@ford.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 2:08 PM To: Tivoli NetView Discussions Subject: RE: [NV-L] Hsrp issue it is what we told by our ex onsite ibm person and by one
of the 1-800 support people. that is what we are going with
and we lost our test machine, so we can't really test
From: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com [mailto:nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Francois Le Hir Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 1:58 PM To: Tivoli NetView Discussions Subject: Re: [NV-L] Hsrp issue With 7.1.5, netview is able to read the HSRP mib and doesn't delete and
recreate the interfaces anymore. Instead it create an interface in each router
and change to user1 the inactive interface.
we continue to have this issue about hsrp. everytime a router, with hsrp, fails over, netview creates a new fake device, for each interface, in the map. then netview polls each of these fake devices, which is really on the same router, and could be 30-40 times, and pegging 100% cpu on the router, and taking them down. This is on netview 7.1.4 fp 4. we've been told going to fp5 would probably fix this but it would probably break everything else that we have Ideas? Thanks
_______________________________________________ This message (including any attachments) contains
confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is
protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete
this message.
Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
[v.E.1]
_______________________________________________ NV-L mailing list NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to internal IBM'ers only) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [NV-L] Hsrp issue, Van Order, Drew \(US - Hermitage\) |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [NV-L] Polling interval for new SNMP database daemons, Jane Curry |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [NV-L] Hsrp issue, Van Order, Drew \(US - Hermitage\) |
Next by Thread: | [NV-L] Network:Frame Relay - problem / solution, Davis, Donald |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web