The issue you will have if you need MLMs is that neither the Linux nor
the Windows NetView Server support configuration of an MLM. The AIX and
Solaris flavours have both a menu option to bring up a menu-driven way
of configuring an MLM of any architecture (smconfig tool) AND AIX and
Solaris have the APM machanism for configuring remote MLMs and
distributing these configurations.
That said, if all you want your MLMs for is to drop unwanted TRAPs, then
your MLM configuration job shouldn't be too horrendous. I suggest you
look at the MLM manual (it's a separate book) and also look at a default
MLM config file - you would typically find this under
/var/adm/smv2/mlm/config. Basically you will have to hack the MLM
config file manually and you will need to develop a mechanism for
getting the appropriate config file to each remote MLM.
Cheers,
Jane
Ahsan Ali wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Thanks for this input - its really helpful.
>
> Can Windows MLMs be used with a Linux Netview server or are there some
> gotchas to watch out for if we do this?
>
> -Ahsan
>
> On 7/20/07, Evans, Bill <Bill.Evans@hq.doe.gov> wrote:
>>
>>
>> The three variables which are most important to sizing NetView are the
>> number of operators, the number of interfaces and the number of traps
>> per
>> second/minute. The referenced Installation Guide GC32-1842-00 discusses
>> this in detail in appendix A. The book is available online. The
>> calculation of the number of interfaces is more important than the
>> number of
>> nodes. X-Windows consoles consume more resources than Web Consoles.
>>
>> A Very Large Network is characterized by:
>>
>> more than 50000 interfaces
>> 10 to 20 web consoles and 3-4 X-windows operators
>> 1-5 traps per second with short bursts up to ten per second.
>> There are also considerations of SNMP data collection to add into the
>> calculation along with external connections to TEC or other systems.
>>
>> The recommendation for a Very Large Network on Linux is to use a FOUR
>> PROCESSOR system with THREE GHZ processors and a FOUR to SIX GB memory.
>>
>> MLMs, one for every 3000 interfaces, would be a possibility and could
>> move
>> your main NetView back to the MEDIUM category (10000-25000
>> interfaces) where
>> they recommend "two to four processors". That would assume that most
>> of the
>> traps could be filtered out and the forwarded ones would be in the
>> ten per
>> MINUTE range and polling would be offloaded to the MLMs. If your
>> network is
>> really "nation wide", MLMs should be placed at remote sites where
>> practical.
>> They should be "local" to concentrations of monitored devices.
>>
>> Alternatives for reducing the need are to slow down your network
>> polling to
>> less than five minute cycles and turning off the non-critical traps
>> at the
>> source. For example, Authentication traps should probably be logged
>> and not
>> handled by traps to NetView unless there is a really critical security
>> requirement. If you can't control traps at the source you can also
>> configure NetView to discard them at the first level daemon instead of
>> investing resources in logging and processing them.
>>
>> Good luck. Count those interfaces and verify the number of traps
>> expected
>> then figure your system size.
>>
>> Bill Evans.
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com
>> [mailto:nv-l-bounces@lists.ca.ibm.com]
>> On Behalf Of Usman Taokeer
>> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 7:39 AM
>> To: Tivoli NetView Discussions
>> Subject: Re: [NV-L] Netview Recommendation Required!
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your input Ahsan
>>
>> So the combination would be a Linux box with NV 7.1.5? Would a dual
>> 3.0Ghz
>> proc machine with 2GB memory be good enough to handle this?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Usman
>>
>>
>>
>> On 7/20/07, Ahsan Ali <ahsanali@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Take a look at Appendix A in the Linux / Unix Netview Installation
>> guide.
>> >
>> > A trap rate of 5/sec falls in the category of Very Large Network. With
>> > an MLM doing some trap supression/throttling your network might be
>> > manageable with the sizing for a Medium sized network.
>> >
>> > >From Appendix A:
>> > ===============================================
>> > A two or four-processor system with 2 GB of memory, one or two disk
>> > drives, 100 MB Ethernet connection, and an appropriate video card.
>> >
>> > Example systems:
>> >
>> > * For AIX(R) environments: IBM(R) pSeries(R) 7028 or pSeries 550
>> > with four processors at 1.45 - 1.6 GHz.
>> > * For Windows(R) and Linux(R) environments: IBM xSeries(R) 365
>> > with four processors at 3.0 GHz or xSeries 366 with four processors at
>> > 3.6 GHz.
>> > ===============================================
>> >
>> > As for Linux/Unix vs Windows, it is my opinion that Linux and Unix are
>> > the only way to go if you want to have any sort of life outside of the
>> > Network Operations Center.
>> >
>> > For the experts on this list, FP01 for 7.1.5 is out so are the early
>> > teething problems sorted out?
>> >
>> > -Ahsan
>> >
>> > On 7/19/07, Usman Taokeer < usman.taokeer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Hi List,
>> > >
>> > > We have a 2000 node network, spanning nation-wide, media is a mix of
>> ISDN
>> > > BRI, Lease Cuircits & VSAT. Approx events/traps per sec would not be
>> more
>> > > than 5 per second. Which platform for Netview would you recommend
>> i.e
>> Unix
>> > > or Windows and which version 7.1.4 or 7.1.5.
>> > >
>> > > Is there a need of using MLM's in this scenario or can NetView
>> server
>> handle
>> > > these traps.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Usman
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > NV-L mailing list
>> > > NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
>> > > Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
>> > > http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser
>> > > access limited to internal IBM'ers only)
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > ---
>> > Due to a shortage of devoted followers, the production of great
>> > leaders has been discontinued.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > NV-L mailing list
>> > NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
>> > Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
>> > http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser
>> access limited to internal IBM'ers only)
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NV-L mailing list
>> NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
>> Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
>> http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser
>> access limited to internal IBM'ers only)
>>
>>
>
>
--
Tivoli Certified Consultant & Instructor
Skills 1st Limited, 2 Cedar Chase, Taplow, Bucks, SL6 0EU, UK.
Registered in England & Wales, Company No. 3458854.
Tel: +44 (0)1628 782565
Copyright (c) 2007 Jane Curry <jane.curry@skills-1st.co.uk>. All rights
reserved.
_______________________________________________
NV-L mailing list
NV-L@lists.ca.ibm.com
Unsubscribe:NV-L-leave@lists.ca.ibm.com
http://lists.ca.ibm.com/mailman/listinfo/nv-l (Browser access limited to
internal IBM'ers only)
|