| To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: File System Monitoring -Reply |
| From: | Michael Seibold PTS/M-SW <mseibold@STR.DAIMLER-BENZ.COM> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 Jun 1998 17:18:33 +0200 |
| Organization: | str.daimler-benz.com |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView et alia <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> |
| Sender: | Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView et alia <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> |
Hi Etienne,
as far as I found out: if your Object has two or more IP-adresses
assigned, running in different IP-Segments, it's assumed to be a router.
Michael Seibold
Etienne Lequeux wrote:
>
> I ve some hosts considered as routers ("IsIPRouter true") by Netview. These
> hosts are not ip forwarders, although multi-homed. Their MIBs are correctly
> filled (ipforward no).
> Could somebody tell me what are nv6k criterias, to consider a node as router ?
>
> --
> +-------V-------+ Etienne lequeux ISSF/IRLEu
> | A L C A T E L | mailto:Etienne.Lequeux@eu.cit.alcatel.fr
> +---------------+ Alcatel Eu
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: What is better Netview V4 or V5, Leszek Pisarek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Antwort: SNMP Setup / Netview Security, Juergen Strittmatter |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: File System Monitoring -Reply, Etienne Lequeux |
| Next by Thread: | Source of subnetmask on NetView server with 3 interfaces, Kammerstetter Bernhard |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web