nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: HACMP

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: HACMP
From: Ray Schafer <schafer@TKG.COM>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 17:16:01 -0400
In-reply-to: <85256666.0059B07E.00@smtpgtwy02.stentor.ca>
Reply-to: schafer@tkg.com
Sender: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView et alia <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
> From: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView et
> alia [mailto:NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU]On Behalf Of Moise Dignard
> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 1998 12:59 PM
> To: NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU
> Subject: HACMP
[...]
> My problem is about NV reporting the standby addresses as red or down. The
> HACMP standby addresses were not resolvable! The ethernet cards are up but
> cannot be pinged due to the address not being "passed" by the network.
> This is OK from a HACMP perpective. But from a monitoring perpective the
> adapters will show red.

Why not just unmanage them?
--
Ray Schafer                   | schafer@tkg.com
The Kernel Group              | Network Computing Consulting

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • HACMP, Moise Dignard
    • Re: HACMP, Ray Schafer <=

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web