Even for TIPN, NetView does not have to be on the TMR Server.
For integration with Inventory, NetView V5.1 must be on the same box as
Tivoli Inventory and for TEC, a TEC console must be installed.
We are well aware that it would seriously impact NetView's "installability"
if it had to be on the TMR server, and there are no plans to require that.
James Shanks
Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support
"Miner, Eric" <eric.miner@TRAVELERS.COM> on 09/28/98 05:20:20 PM
Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
NetView et alia <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
To: NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU
cc: (bcc: James Shanks)
Subject: TME planning for migration from NetView 4.1 to NetView 5.1
Hello,
We are planning our migration from NetView 4.1 to NetView 5.1. One
decision that we are pondering is whether to make our NetView Server a TME
Server or a TME Managed Node of our existing TEC TMR. (By the way, we have
no NetView Client systems.)
I am getting the picture that the main use of the framework today is for
install of NetView 5.1 and then after installation, NetView pretty much
runs independent of the framework. However, we have an interest in
exploring the Tivoli Integration Pack for NetView in the near future and
would also like to position ourselves for the future (when NetView has
closer ties to the framework??). That said, one major goal that we have is
to keep our NetView system as insulated as possible from problems in the
larger Tivoli environment.
Has anyone developed any guidelines for making the TMR Server vs. Managed
Node decision?
Thanks much,
Eric Miner, Travelers Property Casualty
|