Hi James:
I searched the object by the number, but is not in the database, is possible
that one map know
one object that is not in the database of objects?
thanks in advance,
Sergio Cardona.
Vision Tech
James_Shanks@tivoli.com wrote:
> No, it is NOT the OID. It is a unique identifier to distinguish this
> object from all others in the NetView database. There can be many objects
> with the same OID, but only one will have that number.
>
> Finding it on the map is two-step process. First you find it in the object
> datbase to obtain the selection name and then you locate that on the map.
> Start with ovobjprint -o <object id) and find out what this thing is
> called. Then open your read-write map, pull down Locate, then Objects, and
> then by selection name.
>
> James Shanks
> Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support
>
> Sergio Cardona F <sergcafe@apolo.visiontech.com.co> on 02/01/99 11:36:44 AM
>
> Please respond to sergcafe@visiontech.com.co
>
> To: James Shanks
> cc: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView
> <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
> Subject: Re: database error
>
> Thanks James:
>
> But, How can I find one object in the maps by its number ?.
> One question more, this number is the oid ?.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sergio Cardona.
> Vision Tech
>
> James_Shanks@tivoli.com wrote:
>
> > What about object 48955? That's the one causing the problem. ipmap
> has
> > been told by ovtopmd (the topology database manager) that he has an
> update
> > for that object, and the topology record says that it is in network
> object
> > 50057, but that does not exist (for somw reason or other). Can you find
> > 48955 and delete it (from all submaps) so it can get re-discovered
> > correctly?
> >
> > James Shanks
> > Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support
> >
> > Sergio Cardona F <sergcafe@apolo.visiontech.com.co> on 01/30/99 01:28:14
> PM
> >
> > Please respond to sergcafe@visiontech.com.co
> >
> > To: NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu
> > cc: (bcc: James Shanks)
> > Subject: Re: database error
> >
> > Hi All:
> > Yes, I made a mistake , but I made the ovobjprint with -o and this
> object
> > is
> > not int the database.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Sergio Cardona.
> > Vision Tech.
> >
> > Leslie Clark wrote:
> >
> > > See the man page for ovobjprint. -s is for selection name, -o is for
> > > objectid.
> > >
> > > I see those from time to time and and have assumed they were netview
> > > talking to itself. It would be good to know if they indicate a problem.
> > > Anybody
> > > know?
> > >
> > > Cordially,
> > >
> > > Leslie A. Clark
> > > IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
> > >
> > > Hi All:
> > >
> > > We have NetView 5.1 with aix 4.2.1 in a HACMP enviroment.
> > > I have this case:
> > > When the netview goes up, it puts some errors in the nettl.LOG00, these
> > > errors
> > > look like:
> > >
> ========================================================================
> > > ************************************ NetView
> > > *******************************@#%
> > >
> > > Timestamp : Fri Jan 29 1999 17:48:15.900794
> > > Process ID : 17878 Subsystem : OVW
> > > User ID ( UID ) : 203 Log Class : ERROR
> > > Device ID : -1 Path ID : -1
> > > Connection ID : -1 Log Instance : 0
> > >
> > > Software : /usr/OV/bin/ipmap
> > > Hostname : antioquia.bancolombia
> > >
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > Unable to find network 50057 which contains node 48955
> > >
> ========================================================================
> > >
> > > I search in the database with the ovobjprint -s 50057 and it returns
> me:
> > > Object 50057 not found.
> > > OBJECTID SELECTION NAME
> > >
> > > ****** NO SUCH OBJECT ID ******
> > >
> > > Could you tell me what it means ?
> > > I suppose that I have one map with this ghost symbol, but I do not
> know
> > > how to
> > > locate this object.
> > > I already deleted all ghost symbols in all maps and I make ovmapcount
> and
> > a
> > > ovtopofix, but the problem continues.
> > > How can I locate this type of symbols by the number ?
> > > How can I fix it ?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Sergio Cardona
> > > Vision Tech
|