To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Unadministered subnet masks and Netview topology |
From: | Leslie Clark <lclark@US.IBM.COM> |
Date: | Tue, 16 Feb 1999 13:19:45 -0500 |
Reply-to: | Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> |
Sender: | Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU> |
This is a new one on me. Is anyone out there running with unadministered masks on their hubs and switches? I have a customer who only administers them on the routers because they use proxy arp and therefore don't need masks on end nodes. Of course Netview is drawing every hub, switch, and server in the whole network on the same class-B subnet. This makes it hard to associate a device with a section of the network, to say the least. So has anyone come up with any clever solutions, or did you just break down and apply the masks? Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | How to get Tivoli Distributed Monitoring running, Igor Podlivalchev |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Events to different TEC servers, Prokott, Joe |
Previous by Thread: | How to get Tivoli Distributed Monitoring running, Igor Podlivalchev |
Next by Thread: | Re: Unadministered subnet masks and Netview topology, Leslie Clark |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web