nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Router Configuration and Netview

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Router Configuration and Netview
From: Rob Wilkinson <Rob.Wilkinson@MBS.GOV.ON.CA>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 16:41:29 -0500
Reply-to: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
Sender: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
We have several routers (1700) that are various models like 25xx, 45xx and 75xx.

I noticed that on a 45xx router we have has two ip addresses for the same 
interface as follows:

root@mbems01[/usr/delme]>rnetstat.ksh hke01c45
Interface                 IP address      Network Mask    Network Address Link 
Address
Serial10                  142.145.6.1     255.255.255.128 142.145.6.0     
<none>              
Serial8                   142.145.15.2    255.255.255.128 142.145.15.0    
<none>              
Serial2                   142.145.18.129  255.255.255.128 142.145.18.128  
<none>              
Serial4                   142.145.65.129  255.255.255.128 142.145.65.128  
<none>              
Serial7                   142.145.128.129 255.255.255.128 142.145.128.128 
<none>              
Serial0                   142.145.143.1   255.255.255.128 142.145.143.0   
<none>              
Serial5                   142.145.151.1   255.255.255.128 142.145.151.0   
<none>              
Serial3                   142.145.159.1   255.255.255.128 142.145.159.0   
<none>              
Serial1                   142.145.182.129 255.255.255.128 142.145.182.128 
<none>              
Serial6                   142.145.239.1   255.255.255.128 142.145.239.0   
<none>              
Serial9                   142.145.245.1   255.255.255.128 142.145.245.0   
<none>              
Serial8                   172.19.14.2     255.255.255.252 172.19.14.0     
<none>              
Serial9                   172.19.14.5     255.255.255.252 172.19.14.4     
<none>              

See Serial9..

Does any one know if Netview has problems with these so called "Private 
addressing scheme"?

I am told that these 172.* addresses are being defined to reclaim some of the 
142.* addresses because we ran out of 142's..

Any thoughts?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web