nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Question about MLM

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: Question about MLM
From: Leslie Clark <lclark@US.IBM.COM>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 23:58:28 -0400
I'm not sure what the question is. Assuming you don't want both
netmon and the MLM to poll the same devices, you need to make
sure that you have told netmon that the MLM will take over the
polling. That is an option on the netmon daemon. The way to
check who is responsible for what is
   netmon   -a  51     (lists nodes with managing MLM)
   netmon   -a  102  (lists nodes by managing MLM)
The output is in /usr/OV/log/netmon.trace

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking



> I have installed MLM in the PC with ip 10.28.28.237.
>
> Therefore i received a trap from the MLM that one node ( 10.28.28.145 ) is
> down.
>
> After that i also received a trap from internal netview trap ( the trap
> same as without MLM ).
>
> From here, is it the subnet 10.28.28.0 is being polled by both ( internal
> netview trap and MLM )
>
> Remark : MLM is not installed in the same netview server.
>
> Here the part of trapd.log
>
> 934918233  3  Tue Aug 17 14:30:33 1999 10.28.28.237              n MLM
> detected
> interface 10.28.28.145 down for node 10.28.28.145.
> 934918233  3  Tue Aug 17 14:30:33 1999 10.28.28.237              n MLM
> detected
> interface 10.28.28.145 down for node 10.28.28.145.
> 934918234  3  Tue Aug 17 14:30:34 1999 10.28.28.145              N
> Interface 10.
> 28.28.145 down.
> 934918234  3  Tue Aug 17 14:30:34 1999 10.28.28.145              N Node
> Down.
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web