I was just looking at the trapd.log and noticed them (this goes back to
the mlm node up/down event)
935604947 7 Wed Aug 25 14:15:47 1999 <none> d
netmon-related Application connected to trapd.
935604947 3 Wed Aug 25 14:15:47 1999 test1 d
test1: Node Up
935604947 7 Wed Aug 25 14:15:47 1999 <none> d
netmon-related Application disconnecting
Shanks wrote:
>
> By themselves, these messages mean nothing. Some applications, like the event
> command, routinely connect and disconnect from trapd. Type "event -h test1"
> and then go look in the trapd.log. You will see that the "connected" message
> precedes the dummy node up event, and the disconnected one follows. So this
> is
> normal if you are using that in a script somewhere. In other cases, this
> is a
> problem that requires investigation.
>
> What else happens at about this time? Are these always back-to-back in the
> trapd log? Have you tried formatting the nettl logs to look for errors?
> What
> options are you running on trapd?
>
> Are you having a problem that causes you to investigate this or are you just
> curious?
>
> James Shanks
> Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support
>
> Rob Napholz <tel1rxn@NJCMAIL.UPS.COM> on 08/25/99 01:18:58 PM
>
> Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView
> <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
>
> To: NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU
> cc: (bcc: James Shanks/Tivoli Systems)
> Subject: netmon-related Application connected to trapd
>
> Has any one seen these traps before
> this is a small sample of ~2400 traps from yesterday
>
> from trapd.
> 935564096 7 Wed Aug 25 02:54:56 1999 <none> n
> netmon-related Application connected to trapd.
> 935564096 7 Wed Aug 25 02:54:56 1999 <none> n
> netmon-related Application disconnecting from trapd.
> 935564105 7 Wed Aug 25 02:55:05 1999 <none> n
> netmon-related Application connected to trapd.
> 935564105 7 Wed Aug 25 02:55:05 1999 <none> n
> netmon-related Application disconnecting from trapd.
> 935564195 7 Wed Aug 25 02:56:35 1999 <none> n
> netmon-related Application connected to trapd.
>
> Any ideas
> thanks Rob
|