Is this if you are on the machine locally only or also if you export the
DISPLAy back to a session that is telneted in?
-----Original Message-----
From: James Shanks <James_Shanks@TIVOLI.COM>
To: NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
Date: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: Client verses running X
Using telnet puts a 32 - 48 Meg RAM requirement on your server for each
additional user of the NetView GUI, depending on the release level and
functions
used. This is what is offloaded to the NetView client - you are
shifting that
RAM requirement to another box.
James Shanks
Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support
Bill Painter <william.t.painter@LMCO.COM> on 09/27/99 11:52:14 PM
Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
NetView
<NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
To: NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU
cc: (bcc: James Shanks/Tivoli Systems)
Subject: Client verses running X
What are the differences between running a client and running X back to
your
Display? Does it make for less resource use on the server?
Any comments?
Thanks,
Bill Painter
Is this if you are on the machine locally only
or also if you export the DISPLAy back to a session that is telneted
in?
Using telnet puts a 32 - 48 Meg
RAM requirement on your server for each additional user of the NetView
GUI, depending on the release level and functions used. This is
what is offloaded to the NetView client - you are shifting that RAM
requirement to another box.
James Shanks Tivoli (NetView for
UNIX) L3 Support
Bill Painter <william.t.painter@LMCO.COM>
on 09/27/99 11:52:14 PM
Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView
and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView
<NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
To:
NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU cc:
(bcc: James Shanks/Tivoli Systems) Subject: Client verses running
X
What are the differences between running a client and
running X back to your Display? Does it make for less resource
use on the server?
Any comments?
Thanks, Bill
Painter
|
|