When I run the nv6000 -verify, I get a long list of commands (1255 lines)
and at the end it says verification complete. I looked through the file and
could not find any line that looked like a failure or an error.
When I run the nv6000 -config, it gets to a specific symbol (cpw216) and
that is the last successful symbol compiled.
I am trying to determine how the files are processed (i.e. by OID, order in
oid_to_sym file, etc) to determine what the next file would be.
Patrick
-----Original Message-----
From: BENNETT.CHRIS@canadatrust.com [mailto:BENNETT.CHRIS@canadatrust.com]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 11:20 AM
To: patrick_mcneil@YAHOO.COM; lclark@US.IBM.COM
Subject: Error reading background file
Patrick / Leslie: I've had this in the past, to clear it up, I'd suggest the
following:
1) close map
2) nv6000 -verify | more (this will show which bitmap it is dying on
3) nv6000 -config | more
4) correct or delete bitmaps which are causing issue
5) open map
I believe that you won't need to cleanup any bitmaps just run the two nv6000
commands to re-read the files correctly.
Chris Bennett
Canada Trust
------------------( Forwarded letter 1 follows )---------------------
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 10:34:10 -0600
To: NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu
From: patrick_mcneil@YAHOO.COM
Sender: owner-nv-l@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU
Reply-To: patrick_mcneil@yahoo.com
Subject: Error reading background file
Hello,
I recently updated some of our Cisco view information in NetView and since
the upgrade, I have started to received the following message when the
system starts up:
Error during reading background file. Press Ok.
Everything seems to work fine (i.e. the devices all have icons). We don't
use back ground bitmaps (at least not yet). I am assuming this is related
to the bitmaps in the /usr/OV/bitmaps/C directory. When I do a
NetView -config, I get the same message and it appears to be after a
particular file that is being worked on.
My question is what order does the NetView -config process the bitmaps. I
assumed that it was top to bottom from the oid_to_sym file, but based on the
order of the symbols being processed, it does not appear to be so.
Any help would be appreciated.
Patrick
|