Hi Leslie !
Indeed i chosed to do it for testing purpose, to be
sure to have a rearm event. I think you are right when
you say that MLM refuses to send a rearm because it
will have to do it all the time.
In fact it does so for some instance of the data.
I will try with a more logical rearm condition.
Thank you for your help.
Alexis Henry
Banque Nationale de Paris
-------------------------------------------------
--- lclark@us.ibm.com a écrit:
>
>
> Alexis, did you choose the rearm value of 1 just for
> testing purposes?
> Because logically the rearm event should indicate
> that you no longer
> have a problem, which would be something > 200. I
> suspect that
> MLM knows this and refuses to send a rearm because
> it would have to
> send a rearm on every poll in your case.
> You might try a threshold of <30 and a rearm of >31
> if you want to see
> some events.
>
> Anybody have a clearer picture?
>
> Cordially,
>
> Leslie A. Clark
> IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
> Detroit
>
=========================================================
>
> Hi everybody !
>
> I'm working whith Mid Level Manager and have a
> problem
> thresholding MIB values.
>
> I want to receive a trap from a DHCP when any of its
> scope has less than 200 free adresses. I decided to
> arm my threshold when i have less than 200 free
> addresses ad to rearm it when i have more than 1
> address free in order to test MLM capabilities to
> manage multiple instances MIB value.
>
> First all was OK, i received a trap from each scope
> (ie subnet in my case) thas has less than 200 free
> addresses.
> But i expected to receive during the next poll some
> trap because most of my scope have around 30 free
> address. This is not the case, i didn't receive any
> trap comming from a rearm threshold.
>
> I m running netview 5.1 on Aix 4.3.2.
> I configure my threshold to send a trap for arm and
> rearm.
>
> I was thinking that MLM isn't able to manage
> multiple
> MIB value and try to manage a specific instance (an
> unique scope) without any success.
>
> Here is my threshold:
>
> OID: .1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.3.2.1.1.3.* (for all
> scopes)
> or
> .1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.3.2.1.1.3.172.29.52.0 (
> to
> manage 172.29.52.0 subnet's scope)
>
> Arm condition : <200
> Rearm condition: >1
>
> I have the following result for this threshold:
>
> Result: 30 (i have 30 free address)
> Arm Count met: 76 (number of scope with less
> than
> 200 free address)
> Rearm count met : 0
>
> Anybody has a solution ???
>
> Best regards.
>
>
>
> Alexis Henry
> Banque Nationale de Paris
> nv_alexis@yahoo.fr
>
___________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Achetez, vendez! @ votre prix! Sur
> http://encheres.yahoo.fr
>
_________________________________________________________________________
>
> NV-L List information (unsubscribing, policies,
> posting, digest version,
> searchable archives): http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________________
>
> NV-L List information (unsubscribing, policies,
> posting, digest version,
> searchable archives): http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
>
___________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Achetez, vendez! À votre prix! Sur http://encheres.yahoo.fr
|