To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Upgrading from Netview 5.x to 6.0 - trap descriptions too long |
From: | "Capers, Janelle (US - Hermitage)" <jcapers@dttus.com> |
Date: | Mon, 12 Jun 2000 13:44:24 -0700 |
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. Thanks James. I do understand the limitation that you mention with awk. You are right about other vendors using the Trap Descriptions as a surrogate to training and man pages but I really hate to loose the info - many vendors don't provide enough and then we're left to guess what the traps mean or refer to books which may not be on hand. I have editted my trapd.conf by hand. It was a little painful but it's done now! Thanks again. Janelle -----Original Message----- From: James_Shanks@tivoli.com [mailto:James_Shanks@tivoli.com] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 3:41 PM To: IBM NetView Discussion Subject: Re: [NV-L] Upgrading from Netview 5.x to 6.0 - trap descriptions too long This issue is much older than 6.0, and in fact the same migration issue exists for going from Version 5.0 to 5.1, and 4.0 to 5.0. The merging of the new entries in the trapd.conf for the new release, with what you have customized in the old one is done by awk, and awk has a 99-argument limit. That's where the issue arises. No NetView traps have a description which exceeds 99 characters, but that is not the case for some other vendors, who have tried to use the trap description as a surrogate for operator training or man pages, and that is how the problem arises. In some previous releases, not only did the contents of the trapd.conf file change, but sometimes also the structure, making the merge script the only way a migration could be done. But the structure did not change for 6.0 from Version 5.1. Do you want an alternative migration procedure for 6.0? This one should work: (1) make a copy of your trapd.conf file and store it away somewhere. (2) replace it with the default one shipped in /usr/OV/newconfig/OVSNMP-RUN (3) do your migration (4) ovstop trapd. (4) rename your /usr/OV/conf/C/trapd.conf to some trapd.conf.BAK , and replace your old one in the same directory from wherever you stored it. Now use diff -w to show you the changes between the two and make updates in your old trapd.conf to match the new additions in 6.0. (5) source the Tivoli environment and ovstart trapd. If you have made any errors in the additions that really matter, trapd won't start and you will get an error message as to the line which is in error. (6) fix your errors and repeat step 5 until successful (6) when trapd finally starts, do ovstart to get everything else going again. Development thought that editing your descriptions permanently or putting them out to a file and later putting them back was an easier procedure. You decide. James Shanks Tivoli (NetView for UNIX and NT) L3 Support "Capers, Janelle (US - Hermitage)" <jcapers@dttus.com> on 06/12/2000 03:03:40 PM Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com> To: "'nv-l@tkg.com'" <nv-l@tkg.com> cc: (bcc: James Shanks/Tivoli Systems) Subject: [NV-L] Upgrading from Netview 5.x to 6.0 - trap descriptions too long Has anyone run into the issue of Trap descriptions being too long when trying to upgrade to 6.0? The pre-installation checklist has you run chktrapd from /cdrom/TOOLS and it looks for traps that are longer than 99 words in definition and flags them as errors that must be corrected. Spanning tree was the first one to get flagged in my case. I have 22 traps that got flagged. Tech. support recommends cutting and pasting the descriptions to a file and the pasting them back once the upgrade is complete. They tell me the upgrade will not proceed until this is done. This seems very odd and "hoaky". Has anyone come up with a better way or found this to not be a requirement? Thanks, Janelle Janelle Capers Enterprise Systems Management Deloitte & Touche PSC Hermitage, TN Thanks James. I do understand the limitation that you mention with awk. You are right
I have editted my trapd.conf by hand. It was a little painful but it's done now! Thanks again. Janelle -----Original Message-----
This issue is much older than 6.0, and in fact the same migration issue exists
No NetView traps have a description which exceeds 99 characters, but that is not
In some previous releases, not only did the contents of the trapd.conf file
Development thought that editing your descriptions permanently or putting them
James Shanks
"Capers, Janelle (US - Hermitage)" <jcapers@dttus.com> on 06/12/2000 03:03:40 PM Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com> To: "'nv-l@tkg.com'" <nv-l@tkg.com>
Has anyone run into the issue of Trap descriptions being too long when
This seems very odd and "hoaky". Has anyone come up with a better way or
Thanks,
Janelle Capers
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Upgrading from Netview 5.x to 6.0 - trap descriptions too long, James_Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Netview version 6.0a, Gavin Newman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Upgrading from Netview 5.x to 6.0 - trap descriptions too long, James_Shanks |
Next by Thread: | Swing plugin for Solaris Netscape, Jane Curry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web