nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re-Discovery under NetView 5.1 on AIX

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: Re-Discovery under NetView 5.1 on AIX
From: James_Shanks@tivoli.com
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 09:16:00 -0400

Les -

Re-discovery will not occur unless you delete the objects from the current
database.  The way to do that is with Locate and Edit.   I question your claim
that these objects are not on any submap -- NetView will put everything in its
databases on the map and there they will stay unless you have removed them.

And when you say 5.1, I hope that you mean "5.1.3" the latest maintenance
release for NetView 5.1.  No one should be doing any map customization at the
older levels, unless they just want to go looking for trouble.

James Shanks
Team Leader, Level 3 Support
 Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT



"Les Dickert" <lesdickert@HOTMAIL.COM> on 08/11/2000 10:34:27 AM

Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>

To:   nv-l@tkg.com
cc:    (bcc: James Shanks/Tivoli Systems)
Subject:  [NV-L] Re-Discovery under NetView 5.1 on AIX




I have come upon a NetView 5.1 under AIX that
has been set up and running for about nine months.
When it was initially set up, the seed file contained
entries that basically told netmon to discover
everything, which it did.  Now we want to eliminate
all of the workstations from the monitoring, and
I have added entries to the seed file to tell netmon
to ignore these (by IP ranges).  None of these workstations
appear on any submaps that have been created.

So the question is, how do I force a re-discovery with
the intent of purging these workstation objects from
all of the appropriate databases.

So far I have:

   1.  Run netmon -y to tell netmon to reload the seed
       file and confirmed from netmon.trace that it did
       reload the seed file.

   2.  Done an ovstop and ovstart several times.

   3.  Confirmed that under the Topology/Status Polling
       Conf, that everything is turned on.

However, it appears that netmon is still remembering about
the workstations because we are still getting Interface up/down
and Node up/down events from netmon about these workstations.

I seems like this would be an ongoing administrative thing to
have to do, ie force a purging of old IP addresses from the
databases, not only in this case, but in cases where IP addresses
are changed by the network wizards.

Thanks,

Les




________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web