My guess would be that the second system, on whose map you say
that subnet is unmanaged, has at least one other map and that subnet
is managed on at least one of them. The extra traffic on the subnet
caused by the first system's rediscovery is causing delayed response
to the status polls of the second system.
To check for multiple maps on the second system, do File...Open and
see what maps are listed. If there is only the 'default' map, then I, too,
am mystified.
Cordially,
Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit
fjliu@CA.IBM.COM@tkg.com on 10/06/2000 11:50:39 AM
Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com
To: nv-l@tkg.com
cc:
Subject: [NV-L] discovery events
I have two netview servers in diffierent subnetwork, they are supposed to
work independently. When I do automatic map generation on one netview,
another netview server also get a lot node down events from the subnet
which is unmanged by him. Does anybody know how it happened?
thanks & Best regards,
Frank Liu
Systems Management & Networking Services, IGS
Tele: (905)316-3754 Fax: (905)315-2535
email: fjliu@ca.ibm.com
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
|