I have no contact with Cisco at all. I am a low level bug fixer. That is
all. Inter-vendor contact is handled by other folks in other departments.
If they do something with Cisco or anyone else, I hear about it after it is
done, not before nor while it is in progress.
I think you misunderstand my role here. I am a volunteer on this list. I
am not required to be here. And I don't represent the marketing nor
development side of Tivoli. I am just providing what help I can about
problems with NetView. My team leader role is just for Level 3, which is
what we call the team of bug fixers, and it just means that I have some
better idea than most what bugs are currently being worked on. Long term
development projects are not in my purview.
That said, I should like to point out that you can get a NetView Cisco
Integration pack from the Cisco web site which we collaborated on, that
adds plenty of Cisco V2 MIBs to NetView, as part of the install. Also, in
6.0.1 we added about 40 V1 copies of Cisco MIBs that people have been
asking for. So it may be that some of what you want is already done.
If you have additional MIBs you want added you can make that known here if
you like, but the official way to get NetView changed is to open an
enhancement request through your marketing rep or make a call to Support.
James Shanks
Team Leader, Level 3 Support
Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT
"Gruner Mike" <mike.gruner@rfv.sfa.se> on 11/17/2000 02:05:00 AM
Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
To: nv-l@tkg.com
cc: (bcc: James Shanks/Tivoli Systems)
Subject: [NV-L] Re: Cisco Mibs and traps to NetView and other NM S
The important thing is that Cisco has been made aware of the problem
and they are doing something about it. This soulution will work
independently
of NMS eg. on both NetView and HP Openview. What about loading the mibs
then ? As mentioned below you add the traps tp trapd.conf bit you will have
to load each mib separately. The thing I want to bring up is that Cisco is
working
to solve the problem with adding mibs and traps to NMS. James haven't you
had any contact with Cisco about this ?
Mike Gruner
>I don't know anything about this Cisco bug fix and it is unlikely that
>anything could be done with it soon. (How can anyone promise to do
>something with a bug fix that isn't finished yet? Since Cisco's
>development cycle and ours doesn't match, you wouldn't see the results
>until after NetView 7.0 comes out late next year.) But as I reported here
>before, if you have NetView Version 6.0.1 for UNIX, you can run
> " nvaddtrapdconf /usr/OV/newconfig/OVSNMP-RUN/trapd.conf "
> and this will merge the sample trapd.conf in newconfig with you current
>one. Usually this is only done at migration time, which is why applying
>6.0.1 doesn't do it automatically. But this will add about 110 Cisco and
>Cisco-related trap definitions to your running trapd.conf (you might want
>to make a backup copy first in case you don't like the results) which
will
>increase it in size about 20%. The ones that were chosen to be included
>are all those that were in the old Cisco addtrap script and those which
>were reported as being used at multiple customers sites by those folks who
>responded to our survey here.
> Unfortunately this was completed late in the 6.0.1 verification cycle
>ad so did not get in the release notes for 6.0.1.
>James Shanks
>Team Leader, Level 3 Support
> Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT
"Gruner Mike" <mike.gruner@rfv.sfa.se> on 11/16/2000 07:40:00 AM
Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
To: nv-l@tkg.com
cc: (bcc: James Shanks/Tivoli Systems)
Subject: [NV-L] Cisco Mibs and traps to NetView and other NMS
Hello,
as I have seen several people have problem with Cisco Mibs and building
traps
from new
cisco mibs. As we have had this problem for several months it's good to
know
that there
are more with this same problem. As Cisco have withdrawn the support of the
script that
build the trapd.conf ( the one which is on the Cisco CCO web-site ) and the
problem arise
when you have new devices to compare a list for each of the devices against
each other
something better has to used. The question is what ? We opened a case at
Cisco
and
finally got them to open a bug ( SCCds19672 ) which will deliver a trap
definition file which would contain all
the Cisco defined traps, represented in a vendor neutral format.Cisco
estimate
that this bug will be fixed
by the first quarter of 2001.
I tried to get Cisco to contact Tivoli so that they could work together but
I
don't know if they have made
this contact....
Hope Cisco will deliver now...
Mike Gruner
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread
Index]
[Search Page]
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
|