Have you try CW2000 on a Solaris 8 for Intel Platform Version machine?
If yes, any known issue?
yong
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leslie Clark [SMTP:lclark@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 10:15 AM
> To: IBM NetView Discussion
> Subject: Re: FW: [NV-L] CiscWorks2000 and Netview together on one AIX
> server
>
> The way I prefer to look at this de-emphasis is that it provides a good
> way
> to get CiscoWorks2000 off the Netview box. Put it on an NT box nearby.
> It's
> such a resource-hog, and Intel servers can be cost-effective. It frees up
> resources for Netview.
>
> Cordially,
>
> Leslie A. Clark
> IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
> Detroit
>
>
> "Gavin Newman" <NEWMANGJ@banksa.com.au>@tkg.com on 11/27/2000 07:00:01 PM
>
> Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
>
> Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com
>
>
> To: nv-l@tkg.com
> cc:
> Subject: Re: FW: [NV-L] CiscWorks2000 and Netview together on one AIX
> server
>
>
>
> When I was discussing CiscoWorks with my Cisco rep recently he said that
> Cisco were "de-emphasising" all platforms except for NT and Solaris, AIX
> and HP-UX were being placed on a "care & maintenance" basis and that their
> strategic platform for the future was to be NT. Read into that what you
> will but it seems to me that they really want everything running on NT
> (God
> help us all!) and that Unix was a non-event for them.
>
> His personal opinion was that the "logic" behind this direction was the
> cost of the supporting hardware and the cost & availability of staff to
> code on the various OS'es. Every man and his dog seems to be an NT expert
> whereas we true Unix afficiandos are seen to be a dying breed. Obviously I
> beg to differ but you can't fight the powers that be.
>
> >>> "Pretorius, Vynita" <VPretorius@fnb.co.za> 27/11/2000 18:01:02 >>>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pretorius, Vynita
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 6:59 PM
> To: 'IBM NetView Discussion'
> Subject: RE: [NV-L] CiscWorks2000 and Netview together on one AIX server
>
>
> Hi
>
> I asked my vendor of Ciscoworks2000 if it worked on AIX and he said it was
> not ported to AIX and was available to SUN(SOLARIS) and NT, Unlike
> Ciscoworks 4 which required a NMS to plug into and would run on AIX.
>
> If I have been misinformed I would really like to know.
>
> Thanks
> Vynita
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edvyn.Lek@BANKOFAMERICA.COM [mailto:Edvyn.Lek@BANKOFAMERICA.COM]
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2000 5:50 PM
> To: IBM NetView Discussion
> Subject: Re: [NV-L] CiscWorks2000 and Netview together on one AIX server
>
>
>
>
> If small network (less than 1000 devices), okay; otherwise on different
> server
> please.
>
>
>
>
>
> Yong Choon Hwa <chyong@internoc.com.sg> on 11/22/2000 10:10:45 PM
>
> Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
>
> To: "'IBM NetView Discussion' (E-mail)" <nv-l@tkg.com>
> cc:
> Subject: [NV-L] CiscWorks2000 and Netview together on one AIX server
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Not long ago, someone asked about the similar question on installing
> CiscoWorks2000 and Netview in a NT server.
> I wonder if it will equally harmful on a Unix box?
> Would it affect the performance?
> Please pour in your view.
>
> Appreciate all contribution
>
> Thank you
> Yong
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> ***** IMPORTANT INFORMATION *****
> This document should be read only by those persons to whom
> it is addressed and its content is not intended for use by
> any other persons. If you have received this message in
> error, please notify us immediately. Please also destroy and
> delete the message from your computer. Any unauthorised form
> of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited.
> Bank SA is not liable for the proper and complete transmission
> of the information contained in this communication, nor for any
> delay in its receipt.
> **********************************************************************
> _________________________________________________________________________
> NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
>
>
|